Methods and compositions for localized agent delivery

ABSTRACT

The invention provides compositions and methods for delivering agents to localized regions, tissues, or organs in vivo by conjugating agent-loaded nanoparticles to cells having homing capability. The agents may be therapeutic or diagnostic agents such as cancer chemotherapeutic agents and imaging agents respectively.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/130,845, filed on Aug. 16, 2011, which claims priority under 35U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/US2009/006290, filed onNov. 24, 2009, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 from U.S.provisional application Ser. No. 61/200,160, filed Nov. 24, 2008, theentire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.

FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

This invention was made with Government support under grant numberRGY0058/2006-C from the Human Frontier Science Program and grant numbersCA140476 and EB007280-02 from the National Institutes of Health. TheGovernment has certain rights to this invention.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of Invention

The invention relates to the delivery of agents to localized regions,tissues, or cells in the body using nanoparticles and cells.

2. Discussion of Related Art

Cell-based immunotherapies are in active development for treatment ofcancer, and adoptive cell therapy (ACT) of cancer with ex vivoactivated/expanded T cells is one of the more promising treatmentscurrently being tested in patients. (Rosenberg et al., Nat Rev Cancer8(4): 299, 2008; Dudley et al., Science 298(5594): 850, 2002; June etal., J Clin Invest 117(5): 1204, 2007; Stephan et al., Nat Med 13(12):1440, 2007; Yee et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(25): 16168, 2002.)These approaches involve the use of autologous T cells taken frompatients that are activated/expanded ex vivo and then reinfused tocombat tumors such as metastatic tumors. Strategies that enhance thepersistence, in vivo expansion, and effector functions of ACT T cellsshould increase the frequency of objective responses. (Rosenberg S A etal., Nat Rev Cancer 8(4): 299, 2008; June C H et al., J Clin Invest117(5): 1204, 2007.) One way to enhance the function of ACT T cells isvia genetic engineering of the cells themselves, introducing chimericreceptors or costimulatory molecules. (Stephan et al., Nat Med 13(12):1440, 2007; Morgan et al., Science 314(5796): 126, 2006; Gade et al.,Cancer Res 65(19): 9080, 2005.)

Interleukin-family cytokines such as IL-2 and IL-15 have been ofparticular interest for promoting the effector functions andproliferation of anti-tumor T cells. IL-2 and IL-15 share some of theirproperties in triggering T cell proliferation/effector function, andsystemic IL-2 has been used to support adoptively transferred T cells inboth mouse models and human clinical trials of cancer treatment.

However, IL-2 expands regulatory T cells that can suppress anti-tumorimmune responses, is known to promote activation-induced cell death(AICD) in T cells, and has substantial toxicity when administeredsystemically. (Antony et al., J Immunol 176(9): 5255, 2006; Fontenot etal., Nat Immunol 6(11): 1142, 2005; Oh et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA100(6): 3392, 2003; Waldmann, Nat Rev Immunol 6(8): 595, 2006; Waldmannet al., Immunity 14(2): 105, 2001.)

In contrast, IL-15 supports T cell proliferation and effector functionswithout promoting AICD. (Oh et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(6): 3392,2003; Waldmann, Nat Rev Immunol 6(8): 595, 2006; Waldmann et al.,Immunity 14(2): 105, 2001.) IL-15 signals through a heterotrimericreceptor composed of a dedicated a chain, a shared IL-2/IL-15Rβ chain,and the common γ chain used by several interleukins. In an unusual modeof function, physiologic IL-15 signaling has been shown to be largelymediated by presentation of the cytokine in trans: cells bearing theIL-15Rα chain bind the cytokine with high affinity and present thecytokine to T cells bearing the β and γ chains. As a result, IL-15Rαchain expression by the responding cells is unnecessary in this context.(Dubois et al., Immunity 17(5): 537, 2002; Stoklasek et al., J Immunol177(9): 6072, 2006.)

Recently, strategies for re-activating or maintaining the activity ofanti-tumor T cells ex vivo have been described, based on strikingeffects of IL-15 on anti-tumor CD8⁺ T cells. IL-15 has been usedinterchangeably with IL-2 as a systemic therapy in preclinical models ofACT, promoting destruction of large melanoma tumors when combined withbooster vaccination to drive expansion of adoptively transferredtumor-specific T cells. (Klebanoff et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA101(7): 1969, 2004.) Teague et al. showed that culture of non-functionalT cells recovered from tumors with IL-15 overcomes the anergic stateobserved in these cells, allowing them to proliferate and regain potenteffector functions. (Teague et al., Nat Med 12(3): 335, 2006.) However,systemically injected IL-15 has been shown to have a short half life ofonly ˜1 hr, and has limited potency in vivo, triggering limitedproliferation of T cells compared to responses observed during prolongedin vitro culture. (Stoklasek et al., J Immunol 177(9): 6072, 2006.) Thisresult may reflect the protein's short half-life and/or limitingavailability of free IL-15Rα chains for binding and trans-presentationof the cytokine.

As a strategy to overcome this limitation, several independent studiesrecently demonstrated that pre-complexation of IL-15 with solublerecombinant IL-15Rα enhances the systemic potency of IL-15 by ˜50-fold,and also raises the half life of the cytokine in serum followingsystemic injection to ˜20 hrs. (Stoklasek et al., J Immunol 177(9):6072, 2006; Dubois et al., J Immunol 180(4): 2099, 2008; Rubinstein et.al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(24): 9166, 2006.) Following on thesefindings, long-term daily injections of IL-15/IL-15Rα complexes havebeen shown to prolong the survival of mice in a spontaneous mouse modelof pancreatic cancer, by reactivating the cytolytic activity oftumor-resident T cells. (Epardaud et al., Cancer Res 68(8): 2972, 2008.)Notably, in these in vivo studies of IL-15/IL-15Rα superagonist (IL-15SA) complex treatment, not only memory CD8⁺ T cells but also naïve CD8⁺T cells were shown to proliferate, upregulate activation markers, andgain effector functions in response to IL-15/IL-15Rα complex, leading togross splenomegaly in mice receiving prolonged IL-15 SA treatment.(Stoklasek et al., J Immunol 177(9): 6072, 2006; Dubois et al., JImmunol 180(4): 2099, 2008; Rubinstein et. al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA103(24): 9166, 2006.) This non-specific polyclonal T cell activationelicited by systemic IL-15 SA may raise the risk of autoimmunity iftreatment is prolonged.

Cytokines such as IL-2 and IL-15 act primarily by acting on T cells, NKcells, and NK T cells to promote immune responses. Complementary tothese signals, Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands have been used in cancerimmunotherapy by driving activation of dendritic cells (DCs) and otherAPCs both in tumor-draining lymph nodes and directly in the tumormicroenvironment. TLRs are pattern recognition receptors that haveevolved to detect a variety of molecules associated with pathogensranging from bacteria to fungi to viruses. TLR ligands trigger DCs toupregulate costimulatory receptors and secrete pro-immunity cytokinessuch as IL-12. (Beutler, Nature 430(6996): 257, 2004; Iwasaki et al.,Nat Immunol 5(10): 987, 2004; Pulendran, Immunol Rev 199: 227, 2004;Reis e Sousa, Semin Immunol 16(1): 27, 2004.) Thus, these factors areunder study as potential adjuvants for vaccines. TLR signaling isimplicated in breaking regulatory T cell-mediated tolerance (Pasare etal., Science 299(5609): 1033, 2003), and sustained delivery of TLRligands to lymph nodes has been shown to break tolerance of tumorself-antigen specific T cells in an adoptive therapy model. (Yang etal., Nat Immunol 5(5): 508, 2004.) Regression of large establishedmelanoma tumors achieved by adoptive therapy augmented with a viralvector vaccination boost may function in part through the sustained TLRengagement provided by viral vector immunization. (Yang et al., NatImmunol 5(5): 508, 2004; Overwijk et al., J Exp Med 198(4): 569, 2003.)In other studies, repeated injections of TLR ligands directly intotumors has been used to promote the activation of tumor-resident APCsand drive effective local immune responses. (Heckelsmiller et al., Eur JImmunol 32(11): 3235, 2002; Furumoto et al., J Clin Invest 113(5): 774,2004; Currie et al., J Immunol 180(3): 1535, 2008.) TLR ligands incombination with IL-10 blockade have also been shown to convertdysfunctional DCs in the tumor microenvironment into a pro-immunityfunctional state. (Vicari et al., J Exp Med 196(4): 541, 2002.)

Drug-loaded synthetic biodegradable polymer nanoparticles are becomingof more interest for treating a variety of diseases, as they may offer alow-cost, readily manufacturable means to achieve sustained drugdelivery at selected target tissue sites and concentrate drugs wherethey are needed in the body. (Davis et al., Nat Rev Drug Discov 7(9):771, 2008.) In the delivery of protein therapeutics, synthetic drugdelivery particles (particles with sizes in the 50-500 nm range,typically) may be able to achieve results comparable to other means ofdelivery such as viral vectors (Green et al., Advanced Materials 19(19):2836, 2007) without the associated side effects of such biologicalvectors, such as anti-vector immune responses or dangers of viralintegration. (Donsante et al., Science 317(5837): 477, 2007; Kresge,IAVI Rep 9(4): 18, 2005; Mingozzi et al., Nat Med 13(4): 419, 2007;Watkins et al., Nat Med 14(6): 617, 2008.) In cancer therapy, passiveaccumulation of nanoparticles at tumor sites via the enhanced permeationand retention effect (Maeda et al., J Control Release 65(1-2): 271,2000; Matsumura et al., Cancer Res 46(12 Pt 1): 6387, 1986) (referringto the combined effects of leaky tumor vasculature and poor lymphaticdrainage often observed at solid tumor sites) has been exploited fortherapeutic and imaging agent delivery to solid tumors. (Davis et al.,Nat Rev Drug Discov 7(9): 771, 2008; Shi et al., Advanced Materials20(9): 1671, 2008; von Maltzahn et al., Bioconjugate Chemistry 19(8):1570, 2008; Drummond et al., Pharmacol Rev 51(4): 691, 1999; Kirpotin etal., Cancer Res 66(13): 6732, 2006; Park et al., Clin Cancer Res 8(4):1172, 2002.)

However, treatment of metastatic disease via systemic injection ofnanoparticle drug carriers is limited by the rapid clearance of typicalnanoparticles. Thus, the half-life of systemically injectednanoparticles or liposomes is typically a few hours or less andaccumulation of particles at tumor sites is often only a very smallfraction (˜1%) of the total injected dose. (Owens, Int J Pharm 307(1):93, 2006; Vonarbourg et al., Biomaterials 27(24): 4356, 2006; Moghimi etal., Pharmacol Rev 53(2): 283, 2001.) Attachment of poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEG) to the surface of liposomes or nanoparticles to createso-called ‘stealth’ carriers can increase the circulation time ofparticles up to ˜24-48 hrs (Owens, Int J Pharm 307(1): 93, 2006;Vonarbourg et al., Biomaterials 27(24): 4356, 2006; Moghimi et al.,Pharmacol Rev 53(2): 283, 2001), but by far the greatest majority ofinjected dose (often >80%) is still scavenged by the spleen and liver,even when targeting antibodies are employed. (Kirpotin et al., CancerRes 66(13): 6732, 2006.) Thus, a substantial quantity of drug cargo isdegraded without effect or worse, may elicit liver toxicity.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to the use of nanoparticles conjugated to cellcarriers to deliver agents in a controlled and localized manner. Theinvention is based in part on the unexpected finding that certainreactive groups exist at sufficient levels on the surface of certainunmodified cell types that facilitate conjugation to nanoparticleshaving complementary reactive groups. The invention is further based inpart on the unexpected finding that nanoparticles can be maintained onthe surface of certain cells without internalization of thenanoparticles, which would interfere with the controlled release of theagents comprised within the nanoparticles. T cells are an example ofcells that fail to endocytose nanoparticles in the ˜150 nm size rangecovalently conjugated to its surface even after many days or throughseveral rounds of cell division. The result is that T cells couldmaintain nanoparticles and release agents in their local environment forprolonged periods. Other cells which have been found to be particularlysuited to conjugation to nanoparticles via their cell surface chemistryare B cells and hematopoietic progenitor cells. The cell carriers may beeukaryotic (e.g., mammalian cells) or prokaryotic (e.g., bacterialcells), and they may be naturally occurring or engineered (or modified).If the carrier cells are bacterial or other prokaryotic cells, they maybe attenuated in order to reduce or eliminate the risk of infection tothe recipient.

Thus, in one aspect the invention provides a method for delivering anagent comprising administering to a subject a nucleated cell bound to ananoparticle that comprises an agent, wherein the cell does notinternalize the nanoparticle, and wherein the agent is released from thenanoparticle in vivo.

Various embodiments apply equally to the preceding aspect of theinvention as well as other aspects recited below, and for the sake ofbrevity these will be recited only once. However it is to be understoodthat combinations of these aspects and embodiments are contemplated bythe invention.

Thus, in some embodiments, the cell is a T cell. In some embodiments,the cell is a B cell, an NK cell, or an NKT cell. In other embodiments,the cell is a hematopoietic progenitor including without limitation apluripotent stem cell (i.e., a long-term reconstituting cell), amultipotent progenitor cell (e.g., a CFU-S or a CFC-GEMM), aunipotential progenitor cell (e.g., a BFU-E). An example of a murinehematopoietic progenitor is a cell lacking lineage marker cell surfaceexpression, and having Sca-1 and/or c-kit cell surface expression, asdescribed herein.

In some embodiments, the subject has a tumor. In related embodiments,the cell is a tumor-reactive T cell. In other related embodiments, thecell homes to the tumor or to the tissue in which the tumor exists(e.g., lymphoid tissue).

In some embodiments, the subject has an autoimmune disease. In someembodiments, the subject has an infection.

In some embodiments, the subject is in need of hematopoieticreconstitution as a result of, for example, myeloablative chemotherapyand/or radiation.

In some embodiments, the cell is a gut-specific T cell. In someembodiments, the cell is a skin-specific T cell.

In some embodiments, the cell is autologous to the subject. In someembodiments, the cell is activated prior to administration to thesubject. In some embodiments, the cell is genetically engineered. Inother embodiments, the cell is naturally occurring.

In some embodiments, the cell is a eukaryotic cell such as a mammaliancell. In important embodiments, the mammalian cell is a human cell. Inother embodiments, the cell is a prokaryotic cell such as a bacterialcell. The bacterial cell may be a Salmonella bacterial cell. In relatedembodiments, the prokaryotic cell, such as a bacterial cell, may beattenuated so as to prevent an infection in the subject.

In some embodiments, the nanoparticle is 20-500 nm in diameter, or100-300 nm in diameter. In some embodiments, the nanoparticle is about150 nm in diameter, or about 200 nm in diameter, or 250 nm in diameter.

In some embodiments, the nanoparticle comprises maleimide reactivegroups on its surface. In some embodiments, the nanoparticle comprises alipid coating.

In some embodiments, the nanoparticle is a DNA nanoparticle (alsoreferred to herein as a DNA-gel nanoparticle) comprising a crosslinkedDNA core and optionally a lipid coating.

In some embodiments, the agent is an imaging agent. In some embodiments,the agent is an immunostimulatory agent. In some embodiments, the agentis a cytokine. In some embodiments, the cytokine is IL-15/IL-15Rα. Insome embodiments, the agent is an antigen. In some embodiments, theagent is an adjuvant. In some embodiments, the adjuvant is a TLR ligand.The TLR ligand may function to stimulate antigen-specific immuneresponses (typically in the presence of exogenous or endogenousantigens) and/or antigen-non-specific immune responses. Thus, the TLRligand may be used in the presence or absence of an antigen. In someembodiments, the agent is an antibody or an antibody fragment. In someembodiments, the agent is a drug. In some embodiments, the agent is achemical compound. In some embodiments, the agent is a nucleic acid. Insome embodiments, the nucleic acid is an siRNA.

In some important embodiments, the agents are anti-cancer agentsincluding anti-cancer antibodies, cancer antigens, anti-cancerchemotherapeutic agents, and the like.

In various embodiments, the agents may be used at doses that are belowdoses required to achieve the same effects in vivo following systemicadministration. In some instances, the doses are at least 2 times less,at least 5 times less, at least 10 times less, at least 20 times less,at least 50 times less, or at least 100 times less than the requiredsystemic dose.

In some embodiments, the cell is covalently bound to a plurality ofnanoparticles. In some embodiments, the plurality of nanoparticlescomprise an identical agent. In some embodiments, the plurality ofnanoparticles comprise different agents. In some embodiments, theplurality of nanoparticles is 50-10,000, or 100-10,000. In someembodiments, the plurality of nanoparticles is about 50, or about 100,or about 150, or about 200, or about 250, or about 500.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises binding thenanoparticle to the cell. In some embodiments, the method furthercomprises providing the cell bound to the nanoparticle.

In some embodiments, the cell is covalently bound to the nanoparticle.

In some embodiments, the agent acts in an autocrine manner (i.e., itacts upon the cell carrier itself). In some embodiments, the agent actsin a paracrine manner (i.e., it acts upon cells other than the cellcarrier). In still other embodiments, the agent acts in both anautocrine and a paracrine manner.

In another aspect, the invention provides a method for delivering anagent comprising administering to a subject a liposome covalently boundto a nanoparticle that comprises an agent, wherein the agent is releasedfrom the nanoparticle in vivo.

In another aspect, the invention provides a method for delivering anagent to a tumor comprising administering to a subject having a tumor atumor-reactive T cell covalently bound to a nanoparticle that comprisesan agent, wherein the agent is released from the nanoparticle in vivo.The tumor may be a lymphoma, and the agent may be an anti-lymphoma agent(i.e., an agent having therapeutic effect on lymphoma). An example ofsuch an agent is an antibody such as rituximab.

In another aspect, the invention provides a method for delivering anagent to a tumor comprising administering to a subject having a tumor atumor-reactive T cell covalently bound to a maleimide-coatednanoparticle that comprises an agent, wherein the agent is released fromthe nanoparticle in vivo. In some embodiments, the agent is ananti-cancer agent. In some embodiments, the agent is an adjuvant. Insome embodiments, the agent is an antigen. In some embodiments, theantigen is a tumor antigen.

In another aspect, the invention provides a method for delivering anagent comprising administering to a subject a cell covalently bound to ananoparticle that comprises an agent, wherein the cell does notinternalize the nanoparticle, and wherein the agent is released from thenanoparticle in vivo.

In another aspect, the invention provides a method for locallydelivering an agent within a subject comprising administering to asubject having a tissue homing cell bound to a biodegradablenanoparticle that comprises an agent, wherein the agent is released fromthe biodegradable nanoparticle in vivo. In some embodiments, the tissuehoming cell is a T cell. In some embodiments, the T cell is a gut-homingT cell. In some embodiments, the T cell is a skin-homing T cell. In someembodiments, the biodegradable nanoparticle is covalently bound to thetissue homing cell.

In another aspect, the invention provides a method for delivering anagent to a lymphoma within a subject comprising administering to asubject having a lymphoma a B or T cell (e.g., a central memory T cell)bound to a nanoparticle or a liposome that comprises an agent, whereinthe agent is released from the nanoparticle in vivo and the nanoparticleis not internalized into the cell. The agent may be an antibody, such asan anti-CD20 antibody, or it may be a chemotherapy, such as fludaribine.Other agents having therapeutic effect on lymphoma may be used in placeof or in addition to anti-CD20 antibody or fludaribine.

In another aspect, the invention provides a biodegradable nanoparticlecomprising maleimide groups on its exterior surface.

In some embodiments, the nanoparticle further comprises a lipid bilayersurface. In some embodiments, the nanoparticle comprises apoly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) core. In some embodiments, thenanoparticle further comprises an agent. In some embodiments, the agentis an immunostimulatory agent. In some embodiments, the agent is anantigen. In some embodiments, the agent is an antibody. In someembodiments, the agent is an adjuvant. In some embodiments, the adjuvantis a TLR ligand. In some embodiments, the TLR ligand is animmunostimulatory agent in the presence or absence of antigen. In someembodiments, the agent is a nucleic acid. In some embodiments, thenucleic acid is an siRNA. In some embodiments, the agent is ananti-cancer agent. In some embodiments, the agent is a cytokine. In someembodiments, the agent is an interleukin.

In some embodiments, the nanoparticle further comprises a plurality ofagents. In some embodiments, the plurality of agents comprises anantigen and an adjuvant. In some embodiments, the plurality of agentscomprises an adjuvant and an anti-cancer agent. In still otherembodiments, the plurality of agents comprises an immunostimulatoryagent and an anti-cancer agent.

In some embodiments, the nanoparticle is 50-500 nanometers in diameter,or 100-300 nanometers in diameter. In some embodiments, the nanoparticleis about 50 nanometers in diameter, or about 100 nanometers in diameter,or about 150 nanometers in diameter, or about 200 nanometers indiameter, or about 250 nanometers in diameter. In some embodiments, thenanoparticle is in a lyophilized form.

In another aspect, the invention provides a composition comprising anisolated T cell comprising a biodegradable nanoparticle at its cellsurface, wherein the nanoparticle comprises an agent. In someembodiments, the biodegradable nanoparticle is covalently conjugated tothe surface of the T cell.

In another aspect, the invention provides a composition comprising anisolated hematopoietic progenitor cell comprising a biodegradablenanoparticle at its cell surface, wherein the nanoparticle comprises anagent. In some embodiments, the biodegradable nanoparticle is covalentlyconjugated to the surface of the hematopoietic progenitor cell. Theagent may be an agent that stimulates the proliferation of hematopoieticprogenitor cells, and optionally their self-renewal or theirdifferentiation towards one or more hematopoietic lineages. Anon-limiting example of such an agent is a GSK3beta inhibitor.

These and other aspects and embodiments will be described in greaterdetail herein.

Each of the limitations of the invention can encompass variousembodiments of the invention. It is therefore anticipated that each ofthe limitations of the invention involving any one element orcombinations of elements can be included in each aspect of theinvention. This invention is not limited in its application to thedetails of construction and/or the arrangement of components set forthin the following description or illustrated in the drawings. Theinvention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or ofbeing carried out in various ways.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings are not intended to be drawn to scale. In thedrawings, each identical or nearly identical component that isillustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. Forpurposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in everydrawing. In the drawings:

FIG. 1A. Nanoparticle-functionalized T cells for ACT.

FIG. 1B. Examples of modes of action for nanoparticles bound to cells,including an autocrine mode of action in which the nanoparticles (andtheir agent payload) act on the carrier cell and a paracrine mode ofaction in which the nanoparticles (and their agent payloads) act oncells in the environment.

FIGS. 2A-D. Liposomes and lipid-coated PLGA nanoparticles for linkage toT cells. (A, B) Unstained cryo-electron microscopy images oflipid-enveloped nanoparticles, illustrating surface lipids. (B ismagnified view of A inset.) Arrows highlight evidence for bilayerformation at the surface of the enveloped nanoparticles. (C) Sizehistograms of lipid-coated PLGA nanoparticles and liposomes from cryoEM.(D) Schematic of maleimide-based conjugation to T cell surface thiols.

FIGS. 3A-B. Maleimide-functionalized nanoparticles stably link to thesurface of T cells without toxicity. Pmel-1 CD8⁺ T cells were incubatedwith 2500 fluorescent DiD-labeled nanoparticles per cell forconjugation, washed, and cultured for 6 days in the presence of IL-2.(A) Confocal microscopy of live cells on day 0 and day 6, showingnanoparticle fluorescence (purple). (B) Viability of particle-conjugatedor control T cells assessed by annexin V and propidium iodide stainingfollowed by flow cytometry analysis.

FIGS. 4A-C. Nanoparticles conjugated via thiols to T cell surfaces donot inhibit T cell proliferation, cytokine production, or target cellkilling. (A, B) DiD-labeled PLGA-core nanoparticles were attached toCFSE-labeled pmel-1 CD8⁺ T cells (2500 nanoparticles/cell), thenparticle-conjugated T cells (bottom panel) or control ‘bare’ T cells(top panel) were stimulated with mature hgp100 peptide-pulsed bonemarrow-derived dendritic cells at a 2:1 T cell:DC ratio; cultures weresupplemented with IL-2 every 2 days. (A) The cells were analyzed by flowcytometry on day 6: Scatter plots of DiD (nanoparticle label) vs. CFSEfluorescence gated on live CD8⁺ cells are shown in the upper panel, andthe corresponding mean nanoparticle fluorescence as a function of thenumber of cell divisions determined from CFSE are shown in the rightpanel. (B) Cytokines secreted by nanoparticle-conjugated T cells () or‘bare’ T cells (o) were measured by ELISA on sups collected at 24 hrs(IL-2) or 48 hrs (IFN-γ and TNF-α). (C) Pmel-1 T cell blasts wereconjugated with 2500 nanoparticles/cell or left unmodified, andco-cultured with hgp100 antigen-pulsed (Mingozzi F et al., Nat Med13(4): 419, 2007) Cr-labeled EL4 target cells or unpulsed control EL4cells, and the % of specific target cell killing was quantified bymeasuring (Mingozzi F et al., Nat Med 13(4): 419, 2007) Cr release after4 hrs for varying pmel-1 effector cell:target cell ratios.

FIGS. 5A-C. Protein and TLR ligand incorporation in lipid-coated PLGAnanoparticles. (A) Confocal image (left) and cryoEM image (right) oflipid-coated nanoparticles loaded with fluorescent ova in the particlecores. Note that the particles in the confocal image are artificiallyaggregated here by drying on a coverslip for imaging. (B) Kinetics ofIL-15 release from lipid-coated PLGA particles in vitro in completemedium at 37° C. (C) Bone marrow-derived DCs were incubated with 3 mg/mLlipid-nanoparticles containing 1 mole % or 10 mole % MPLA in the lipidcoating, equivalent amounts of soluble MPLA (30 μg/mL or 3 μg/mL), orsoluble LPS (1 μg/mL) as a positive control. At 24 hrs, the maturationstatus of the cells was assessed by flow cytometry analysis of cellsurface MHC II, CD80, and CD40 (not shown). Particle-MPLA was equivalentto or more potent than soluble MPLA in triggering DC maturation.

FIG. 6. Bioactivity of cytokine IL-15 released from cell-boundnanoparticles. T cells were conjugated with lipid-coated PLGAnanoparticles loaded with IL-15 or IL-15 complexed with solubleIL-15Ralpha-human Fc fusion protein (IL-15 superagonist). The number ofviable T cells after 6 days in culture was assessed by cell countingafter trypan blue staining. T cells carrying IL-15-loaded nanoparticlesexhibited enhanced survival and/or proliferation.

FIG. 7. Lipid-coated PLGA nanoparticles can encapsulate and then exhibitsustained release of TLR7/8 compounds. Toll-like receptor ligandsgardiquimod or resiquimod were encapsulated in lipid-coated PLGAparticles, and release into BSA-containing saline at 37° C. was assessedover 8 days, by measuring fluorescence of the released compounds.

FIGS. 8A-D. Whole-animal bioluminescence/fluorescence imaging ofnanoparticles, nanoparticle-conjugated T cells, and B16 melanoma tumormodels. (A) T cells polarize surface-bound nanoparticles (redfluorescence) to the uropod during migration. Primed T cells wereconjugated with nanoparticles and then observed migrating on glasscoverslips by time-lapse fluorescence videomicroscopy. Migrating cellsclustered the nanoparticles to the uropod (arrows in first frame denotedirection of migrating cells). Cells that halted and de-polarized evenmomentarily redistributed the nanoparticles over the cell surface,indicating a lack of aggregation among nanoparticles. (B) DiR-labelednanoparticles (1 mg) were injected s.c. in the flank of an anesthetizedmouse and imaged by whole-animal fluorescence (shown in false color onthe right flank). (C) Bioluminescence imaging ofgaussia-luciferase-tagged nanoparticles attached to 4×10⁶ pmel-1 Tcells, 4 hrs after tail vein injection of particle-conjugated T cells.Red arrows denote T cells accumulated in lungs, while white arrowshighlight what may represent T cell homing to axillary lymph nodes. (D)Bioluminescence imaging of Gaussia-luciferase-expressing B16F10 melanomacells, illustrating metastasis 14 days following kidney capsuleinjection.

FIGS. 9A-D. Melanoma-targeting Pmel-1 T lymphocytes vehiclesurface-conjugated nanoparticles into the tumor microenvironment. (A-D)500,000 B16F10 tumor cells, transduced with Gaussia luciferase, wereinjected into the right femur of C57BL/6 mice. After three weeks, tumorburden was visualized by IVIS imaging (A). Animals were treated with15×10⁶ effector Pmel-1 T lymphocytes, transgenic for Firefly luciferase(A-D, left panel), or effector Pmel-1 T cells conjugated withnanoparticles containing the fluorescent tag DiD (A-D, right panel).Before adoptive transfer, T lymphocytes were incubated with lmg/mlThiol-PEG for 30 min to avoid non-specific uptake of surface-boundnanoparticles by macrophages. Four days after T cell treatment, thebiodistribution of adoptively transferred Pmel-1 T cells was imaged withbioluminescence (B), surface-bound nanoparticles were tracked byfluorescent IVIS imaging for DiD (C). The right femurs were flushed andanalyzed by multicolor flow cytometry for T cell infiltrates (Thy1.1)and DiD nanoparticles (D).

FIGS. 10A-B. Nanoparticle-decorated T cells function normally andefficiently carry surface-tethered nanoparticles into antigen-expressingtumors. OT-1 ova-specific CD8⁺ effector T cells were conjugated with 100DNA-gel nanoparticles per cell or left unmanipulated as controls. (A andB) Comparative in vivo bioluminescence (tumors, T cells) andfluorescence imaging (nanoparticles) of mice bearing subcutaneousGaussia luc-expressing EG7-OVA and control EL4 tumors on oppositeflanks, 2 days after i.v. infusion of firefly luc-transgenic Thy1.1⁺effector OT-1 T cells (with or without attached DiD-labelednanoparticles), or an equivalent number of free nanoparticles. Thy1.1⁺OT-1 T cells recovered from the EG7-OVA tumors were analyzed forsurface-bound DiD nanoparticles by flow cytometry (A), and the meanbioluminescent T cell and fluorescent nanoparticle signals from groupsof 6 mice are graphed shown in (B). Shown is 1 of 2 independentexperiments.

FIGS. 11A-C. Tumor antigen-specific T cells transport surface-boundnanoparticles into established TRAMP prostate adenocarcinomas. (A) Sixmonth-old TRP-SIY mice (Bal et al., PNAS USA, 105:13003, 2008), withestablished spontaneous prostate adenocarinomas expressing a shortlinear peptide SIY (SIYRYYGL; SEQ ID NO:1) were injected with 15×10⁶CBR-luciferase-expressing SIY-specific 2C transgenic CD8⁺ T cells. Tcells were left unmodified or were surface-conjugated with DiD-taggedDNA-gel nanoparticles. Alternatively, an equivalent number of freeDiD-labeled particles was injected intravenously. Ventral whole bodybioluminescent acquisitions are shown directly after T cell injection(upper panel), and 3 days later (lower panel). (B) On day 3, prostateswere isolated from euthanized mice, and DiD tissue fluorescence wasquantified using the IVIS Spectrum imaging system. (C) Flow cytometryanalysis of a single cell suspension prepared from recovered prostatesshows a substantial fraction of 2C transgenic T cells still physicallyattached to DiD-labeled DNA-gel nanoparticles.

FIGS. 12A-F. Naïve B lymphocytes transport surface-conjugatednanoparticles into secondary lymphoid organs. (A) Comparative in vivobioluminescence (upper panel) and fluorescence (lower panel) imaging ofC57Bl/6 mice 2 days after infusion of 10×10⁶Firefly-luciferase-transgenic naïve B lymphocytes, labeled withCellTracker Green and decorated with DiD fluorescent DNA gelnanoparticles. Alternatively, mice were systemically injected with anequivalent number of free DiD nanoparticles only. One representativemouse out of 3 injected mice/group is shown. (B) Strong DiD tissuefluorescence was detected in isolated cervical lymph nodes by IVISimaging. (C) Histology of the removed cervical lymph node.High-magnification confocal microscopy (left panel) shows lymph nodehoming B lymphocytes with surface-attached DiD-fluorescentnanoparticles. (D) Biodistribution analysis of B cells carryingIndium-loaded liposomes and empty liposomes. (E) Histology sectionshowing B cells that have homed into lymph nodes still havenanoparticles (blue) attached to their surfaces. (F) Eμ-myc lymphomacells were injected into mice and allowed to establish tumors insystemic lymphoid organs for 14 days prior to injection ofparticle-carrying normal B cells. Flow cytometry shows theliposome-carrying B cells have entered the lymph nodes.

FIGS. 13A-D. Pmel-1 T cells conjugated with IL-15Sa/IL-21-releasingnanoparticles robustly proliferate in vivo and eradicate established B16melanomas. (A) Dual in vivo bioluminescence imaging of Gaussialuciferase-expressing B16F10 lung melanomas andCBR-luciferase-expressing Pmel-1 T cells in sublethally irradiatedC57Bl/6 mice. Lung tumors established by tail vein injection of B16F10cells were treated after 6 days by i.v. infusion of 10×10⁶ Vβ13⁺ CD8⁺Pmel-1 T cells. One group of mice received Pmel-1 T cells conjugatedwith 100 DNA-gel nanoparticles/cell carrying a total dose of 5 μgIL-15Sa/IL-21 (4.03 μg IL-15Sa+0.93 μg IL-21), control groups receivedunmodified Pmel-1 cells and a single systemic injection of the samedoses of IL-15Sa/IL-21 or Pmel-1 cells alone. (B) Frequencies of Vβ13⁺CD8⁺ Pmel-1 T cells recovered from pooled lymph nodes of representativeanimals 16 days after T cell transfer. (C) CBR-luc signal intensitiesfrom sequential bioluminescence imaging every 2 days after T celltransfer. Every line represents one animal with each dot showing thewhole animal photon count. (D) Survival of animals following T celltherapy illustrated by Kaplan-Meier curves. Shown are 6 mice/treatmentgroup pooled from 3 independent experiments.

FIGS. 14A-D. Hematopoietic progenitor cells (referred to in the Figureas HSCs) carrying GSK-3β inhibitor-loaded nanoparticles reconstituterecipient animals with rapid kinetics following bone marrow transplantswithout affecting multilineage differentiation potential. (A, B)Engraftment kinetics of luciferase-transgenic HSC grafts inlethally-irradiated nontransgenic syngeneic recipients. Mice weretreated with a single bolus injection of the GSK-3β inhibitor TWS119(1.6 ng) on the day of transplantation, an equivalent TWS119 doseencapsulated in HSC-attached DNA-gel nanoparticles, or no exogenousagent. Transplanted mice were imaged for whole-body bioluminescenceevery 7 days for 3 weeks. Shown are representative IVIS images (A) andwhole animal photon counts (B) for 9 mice total/treatment condition. (C)Percentage of donor-derived cells in recipient mice 2 weeks aftertransplantation of GFP⁺ HSCs with or without TWS119. *P<0.001. (D)Average frequency of donor-derived GFP⁺ B cells, T cells, and myeloidcells in recipient mice 3 months after transplantation. 5 mice/groupwere analyzed.

FIG. 15. Liposome conjugation to pmel-1 T cells. Confocal image ofliposomes (blue) conjugated to the surfaces of pmel-1 T cells(CFSE-stained in green). Shown are 3D projections of optical sectionstaken by confocal microscopy.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention contemplates combined cell- and nanoparticle-mediateddelivery of agents including drugs. This delivery strategy involves theconjugation of nanoparticles that comprise one or more agents to a cellthat can home to a region, tissue or organ in vivo, thereby resulting inlocalized and controlled delivery of agents in vivo. This approachoffers significant advantages over the prior art approaches ofadministering agents alone or in non-cell bound delivery vehicles suchas nanoparticles. The former approaches suffer from systemic toxicityproblems. The latter approaches suffer from rapid clearance ofnanoparticles via the reticuloendothelial system including macrophagesand Kupffer cells of the spleen and liver (as shown in the Examples),and limitations in biodistribution based on size-mediatedexclusion/inclusion from tissues. The clearance mechanisms preventprolonged release and thus sustained presence of the agent of interestin vivo. Moreover clearance is potentially associated with toxicity inthe liver due to the accumulation of nanoparticles at that site, also asshown in the Examples.

The invention therefore exploits the use of nanoparticles and cells inthe localized delivery of agents. The cells may function simply ascarriers that home to localized regions, tissues or organs within thebody and thereby deliver the agent more specifically within the body(i.e., in a paracrine manner), although in more preferred embodimentsthey also contribute functionally at the ultimate target site and may beacted upon by the agent they are carrying (i.e., in an autocrinemanner). In either event, the cells are referred to herein as carriercells to be distinguished from cells at target sites in vivo.

In one exemplary embodiment, the invention provides a delivery methodbased on conjugation of nanoparticles to tumor-reactive T cells, such asthose used in adoptive cell therapy (ACT). A functionalizedbiodegradable polymer nanoparticle, liposome, or polymer vesicle may beloaded with one or more agents which are released in vivo as thenanoparticle degrades in response to its environment (typically anaqueous environment). This is shown schematically in FIG. 1A. Thisapproach offers several potential advantages over systemic drug therapyincluding the uniform exposure of ACT T cells to the released drugs,focused drug action on the ACT T cells and other T cells at the targetsite, reduced amounts of drugs administered to a subject as a result ofa biodistribution that follows the homing pattern of the T cells,reduced exposure of non-target sites to the drug and thus reducedprobability of non-target toxicity, and extended and sustained releaseof drug over the span of several days.

In a further exemplary embodiment, T cells are conjugated tobiodegradable nanoparticles that comprise immune stimulating agents suchas cytokines, antigens, antibodies, adjuvants or other activation agentsthat function to stimulate or enhance immune responses at the targetsite, maintain activation of the carrier ACT T cells, and/or cause celldeath directly or indirectly at the target site. Exemplary agents areprovided herein and include but are not limited to IL-15/IL-15Rαcomplexes (referred to herein as an IL-15 superagonist, described byRubenstein et al., PNAS 103(24):9166-9171, 2006, the teachings of whichrelating to IL-15 SA are incorporated herein by reference) and TLRligand adjuvants such as MPLA and imiquimod. Such nanoparticles maycontain other agents such as anti-cancer agents, or they may be usedwith other nanoparticles that contain such agents. TLR ligands may actas immunostimulating agents independent of an antigen effect, in someinstances. In still other instances, the agents may be immunomodulatoryor even immunoinhibitory, if it is desired to control or reduce animmune reaction in vivo, such as occurs in autoimmune disorders as anexample.

In some instances, the invention contemplates but is not limited toenhancement (whether additive or super-additive) of the therapeuticbenefit that is provided by standard adoptive cell therapy whichinvolves transfer of cells that are not conjugated to nanoparticles.This enhancement may be measured by reduction in tumor load (or volume)in the case of a subject having a tumor, or reduction in infectiousagent load (for example in a bodily fluid) or reduction in size, depthor volume of an infectious lesion in the case of a subject having aninfection.

It is to be understood that the agents carried by the nanoparticles mayfunction on cells or tissue at the target site (i.e., a paracrinemanner) and/or on the carrier cells themselves (i.e., an autocrinemanner), as depicted in FIG. 1B. Thus for example where the cell is a Tcell (or other cell with homing capability), the agent may be one thatstimulates the carrier cell and optionally cells of the same type at thetarget site (e.g., other tumor-reactive T cells). In other embodiments,the agents comprised within the nanoparticles are intended to act oncells other than the carrier cell. Examples include anti-cancer agentswhich act upon tumor cells and generally will have no effect on T cellsor other carrier cell types.

Targeting primarily the carrier cells, particularly carrier T cells,serves to maintain their proliferation and effector functions whilelimiting nonspecific activation of bystander T cells. It has beenreported that cytokines released in an autocrine manner may be nearlyquantitatively recaptured by the secreting cell, due to the local highconcentration of cytokine and its corresponding upon release from thecell. (Monine et al., Biophys J 88(4): 2384, 2005; Lauffenburger et al.,Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(26): 15368, 1998; Joslin et al., J Cell Sci120(Pt 20): 3688, 2007.) Cytokines such as IL-15 superagonist aretherefore expected to be more potent when released from nanoparticlesconjugated to carrier cells than when administered systemically in anunconjugated form.

An example of a paracrine method involves the delivery of adjuvant(s) toa target site alone or together with antigen(s). Exemplary adjuvants areprovided herein, and these include TLR ligands such as MPLA andimiquimod. These agents can act on dendritic cells and other antigenpresenting cells present at a target site (e.g., a tumor site or a siteof infection or at a secondary lymphoid organ or tissue including butnot limited to spleen and lymph nodes). The cell-mediated deliverymethods of the invention will both increase the local concentration ofagents at the relevant target sites and limit the overall systemicexposure that occurs when the same agents are injected in anunconjugated form.

Thus, as another example of paracrine-acting agent(s), in instanceswhere the target site is a tumor, the nanoparticles may comprise ananti-cancer agent and/or an adjuvant. Once delivered to the target tumorsite, via tumor-reactive T cells, the anti-cancer agent is graduallyreleased resulting in the death of tumor cells whether by necrosis orapoptosis. Such cell death is usually accompanied by fragmentation andrelease of cellular components including antigens specific to the tumorcells. The gradual release of adjuvant from nanoparticles delivered tothe target site will enhance the body's antigen-specific immune responseto the released cancer antigens. The presence of activatedtumor-reactive T cells will serve to localize and enhance the immuneresponse as well. Tumor-reactive T cells have been described previouslyand include without limitation melanoma reactive T cells (e.g., Melan Aspecific T cells described by Li et al., J Immunother. 31(1):81-8, 2008,the teachings of which relating to melanoma-specific T cells areincorporated herein by reference).

Other tumor targets include without limitation lymphomas. In theseinstances, B cells and/or T cells such as central memory T cells may beconjugated to nanoparticles comprising anti-lymphoma agents. Such agentsare known in the art and include without limitation anti-CD20antibodies, such as rituximab. As shown in the Examples, B cells andcentral memory T cells are able to home nanoparticles into lymphoidorgans, in particular the spleen and lymph nodes, and reduce the amountof nanoparticles that would otherwise home and/or deposit in liver andbone. The use of lymphocytes as carrier cells is advantageous becausethe cells are easily obtained from peripheral blood of a subject andthey can naturally home (or be manipulated ex vivo to home) to certaintissues (e.g., lymphoid tissues) or tumors. The invention contemplatesthat other blood diseases including without limitation leukemia may alsobe treated in a like manner.

The foregoing embodiments are intended for illustration and are not tobe construed to limit the invention simply to tumor-specific ACT.Instead, the invention contemplates various other applications wherelocalized delivery of one or more agents and optionally particular cellswould be beneficial. As an example, the invention contemplates deliveryof imaging agents to various distinct regions, tissues and/or organs. Asanother example, T cells may be conjugated to nanoparticles carrying anyvariety and/or combination of agents and can be targeted to any numberof sites in vivo. In this embodiment, T cells can be exploited for theirdemonstrated tropism to different tissues. Examples include naïve Tcells that can carry agent-loaded nanoparticles to lymphoid organs andspleen (e.g., for vaccination), gut-homing T cells that can carryagent-loaded nanoparticles to the gut (e.g., for treatment of cancer orautoimmune disorders), skin-homing T cells that can deliver agent-loadednanoparticles to the skin layers (e.g., for treatment of cutaneouslesions or autoimmune disease), etc. These tissue sites can be targetedsimply by isolating T cells with the appropriate homing receptors fromblood. It is to be understood that the methods provided herein may beused to stimulate (or enhance) immune responses (e.g., against tumors orinfections) or suppress immune responses (e.g., by promoting toleranceto allergens or transplanted tissues).

As a further exemplary embodiment of the invention, hematopoieticprogenitor cells may be loaded with nanoparticles that stimulateproliferation and, in some instances, self-renewal. The Examplesdemonstrate the ability to conjugate nanoparticles comprising theglycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3-beta) inhibitor TWS119 tolineage-negative, Sca-1-positive, c-kit-positive, and the delivery ofsuch cells to a subject. Biodistribution of the administered cells tothe femur, humerus, sternum and spleen of recipients was observed, aswas a normal differentiative potential of such cells several monthspost-transplant.

The methods described herein may be combined with other therapeutic ordiagnostic strategies or methods including without limitation surgery,radiation and/or chemotherapy including immunotherapy.

It has been found, surprisingly, that the method is straightforward toimplement and thus could be easily incorporated into any clinicalprocess. The method requires simple mixing of the functionalized andagent-loaded nanoparticles with the cells of interest, as detailed inthe Examples. Nanoparticles can be prepared and stored in a convenientformat prior to use (e.g., lyophilized powder). Nanoparticles are thenreconstituted in a suitable carrier and incubated with the cellpopulation for a brief period of time. Incubation times may range from1-5 minutes, 1-10 minutes, 5-10 minutes, 5-15 minutes, 5-20 minutes,5-30 minutes, or 5-60 minutes. The mixture is then washed, in someinstances incubated with a blocking agent to quench the reactive groupson the nanoparticle and optionally on the cell, washed again, and thenformulated for administration. Administration typically will occur viathrough parental routes, most preferably intravenous injection.

Carrier Cells

The carrier cells are the cells to which the nanoparticles areconjugated and which when administered in vivo preferably home to targetsite(s). Suitable target cells are chosen based on their homingpotential, their cell surface phenotype (for conjugation to thenanoparticles), and their ability to carry but not significantlyendocytose the nanoparticles. In some embodiments described herein, Tcells are suitable carrier cells. The T cells may be CD4+ or CD8+ Tcells. Other suitable cells include B cells, NK cells, NK T cells, andhematopoietic progenitor cells including without limitation murinelineage-negative, Sca-1-positive and c-kit-positive cells and theirhuman counterparts. B cells for example can be used to carryantigen-loaded nanoparticles into lymphoid organs to promote antibodyresponses or to regulate allergic reactions. Macrophages and dendriticcells typically are not suitable carriers for nanoparticles because oftheir internalizing/phagocytosing capabilities. Substantial levels offree thiol (—SH) groups exist on the surfaces of T cells, B cells andhematopoietic progenitor cells (data not shown), thereby facilitatingconjugation of nanoparticles to such cells.

Carrier cells preferably also are able to extravasate from the bloodvessels (particularly when administered by intravenous injection) andthereby enter target tissues or organs. Red blood cells typically arenot able to exit the blood stream. Accordingly, one important class ofcarrier cells is nucleated cells. This class by definition excludes redblood cells.

Some embodiments of the invention refer to isolated carrier cells.Isolated carrier cells are cells that have been separated from theenvironment in which they naturally occur (i.e., they are not present invivo). T cells in vitro are an example of an isolated cell.

The carrier cells preferably are autologous to the subject beingtreated, however some embodiments of the invention contemplatenon-autologous (yet preferably MHC matched cells).

The carrier cells preferably have half-lifes in vivo, followingadministration (or re-infusion, in some instances) of at least 48 hours,more preferably at least, at least 3 days, at least 4 days, at least 5days, at least 6 days, at least 7 days, or more.

The cells may be genetically engineered to express one or more factorsincluding without limitation costimulatory molecules or receptorsincluding chimeric receptors. In other embodiments, the cells are notgenetically engineered. In some such embodiments, the carrier cells areisolated and naturally occurring (i.e., they have not been geneticallyor otherwise engineered).

Depending on their nature and function, the cells may be manipulatedprior to conjugation with the nanoparticles. The cells however need notbe surface-modified in order to facilitate conjugation of thenanoparticles. The invention in some of its embodiments instead takesadvantage of reactive groups that normally exist on the cell surfacewithout having to incorporate reactive groups or other entities onto thecell surface. As a result, such cells do not require the presence ofexogenous entities such as antibodies or antibody fragments, amongothers, on their surface in order to conjugate to nanoparticles.

Such manipulation may also involve activation of the cells, as isroutinely performed for T cells. The cells may be expanded and/oractivated (or stimulated, as the terms are used interchangeably herein)in vitro prior to mixing with the nanoparticles (or liposomes).Expansion and activation protocols will vary depending on the cell typebut can include incubation with one or more cytokines, incubation withone or more cell types, incubation with one or more antigens, etc. Ifthe carrier cell is a T cell, then activation may be performed byincubating the cells with IL-2, IL-15, IL-15 superagonist, costimulatorymolecules such as B7, B7.2, CD40, antibodies to various T cell surfacemolecules including antibodies to cell surface receptors, anti-CD3antibodies, anti-CD28 antibodies, anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, anti-CD40Lantibodies, and the like. In some embodiments, the cells and moreparticularly the T cells are not coated with exogenous antibodies ontheir cell surface (i.e., the cells have not been contacted withantibodies or antibody fragments in vitro prior to administration).

Expansion may be measured by proliferation assays involvingincorporation of radiolabeled nucleotides such as tritiated thymidine.Activation may be measured by production of cytokines such as IL-2,gamma-IFN, IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, and TNF, among others. Other ways ofmeasuring expansion and activation are known in the art.

Carrier cells may be selected prior to administration to a subject inorder to enrich and thus administer higher numbers of such cells insmaller volumes and/or to remove other, potentially unwanted, cells fromthe administered composition. Selection may involve positive or negativeselection, including for example column or plate based enrichmentprotocols that are known in the art.

T and B cells may be harvested from the peripheral blood of a subject.

Hematopoietic progenitor cells may be obtained from a number of sourcesincluding but not limited to cord blood, bone marrow, mobilizedperipheral blood, and in some instances differentiated embryonic stemcells.

Hematopoietic progenitor cells have been characterized in the art. Suchcells in the human generally have minimally a CD34+ phenotype, althoughthey may also be CD59⁺, Thy1/CD90⁺, CD38^(lo/neg), CD33⁻, and/orc-kit/CD117⁺. They also are characterized as not expressing lineagespecific markers. They can be harvested from bone marrow, cord blood orperipheral blood using affinity columns, magnetic beads, fluorescenceactivated cell sorting (FACS), some combination thereof, and the like.These cells have the ability to repopulate one or more hematopoieticlineages upon transplantation. Preferably, these cells repopulate morethan one lineage, and even more preferably, all lineages. Repopulationor population of lineages as used herein refers to the differentiationof the stem cell into one or more lineages such that progeny of the stemcell contribute to the make up of that lineage in the subject. It doesnot however require that the entire lineage compartment derive from thetransplanted cells, however in some instances this may occur.

Isolated stem cells may be obtained by fractionating a heterogenous cellpopulation according to one or more markers, including by not limited tocell surface markers.

The carrier cells may be eukaryotic cells, such as mammalian cells(e.g., human cells). Alternatively, they may be non-mammalian cells. Instill other embodiments, the carrier cells may be prokaryotic cells(e.g., bacterial cells). Several bacterial cell types are of particularinterest. For example, attenuated salmonella typhimurium is under studyas a candidate vector for oral vaccine delivery (Xiang et al., ImmunolRev 222:117, 2008; and Iweala et al., J Immunol 183(4):2252, 2009) andengineered E. coli bacteria have been shown to be capable of specifichoming to poorly oxygenated tumors (Cheong et al., Science314(5803):1308, 2006). Bacteria offer new modes of administration andtissue site targeting possibilities, such as oral administration and theability to target therapeutics to the gut and gut-associated lymphoidtissues. Such microbial vectors may offer advantages relative toautologous host cells in terms of creating off-the-shelf ready-to-usecell-nanoparticles systems. Particles conjugation to microbes can beachieved using the same suite of chemical strategies described formammalian cells. In some instances, temporary removal of flagellar coatsof microbes (e.g., via simple mechanical shearing as described by Rosuet al., J Bacteriol 188(14):5196, 2006) can be used to achieve optimalconjugation of particles to microbe cell bodies. The ability to enhancethe activity of these cells by conjugating drug-loaded nanoparticles ormicroparticles to them for co-transport to their target tissue sites canbe used to alter their therapeutic efficacy or alter the biodistributionof the synthetic particles as described herein with other cell carriers.The ability of synthetic drug particles to be loaded with small-moleculetherapeutics makes this approach complementary to genetic engineering ofthe microbe.

Nanoparticles

As used herein, nanoparticles are solid colloidal particles used todeliver agent. Nanoparticles are not liposomes, as used herein. Thenanoparticles are not viruses or particles thereof. The nanoparticlesare also to be distinguished from films or other structurally layeredpolymers matrices, since the nanoparticles are comprised of one or moresolidified polymer(s) that is arranged in a random manner. Thenanoparticles are preferably biodegradable and thus typically are notmagnetic. Biodegradable nanoparticles may be synthesized using methodsknown in the art including without limitation solvent evaporation, hotmelt microencapsulation, solvent removal, and spray drying. Exemplarymethods for synthesizing nanoparticles are described herein in theExamples as well as by Bershteyn et al., Soft Matter 4:1787-1787, 2008and in US 2008/0014144 A1, the specific teachings of which relating tonanoparticle synthesis are incorporated herein by reference.

In some embodiments, the nanoparticles are comprised of a nucleic acidinternal core. Such “DNA nanoparticles” (or DNA-gel nanoparticles) aredescribed in greater detail in published U.S. application no. US20070148246. It is to be understood that the nucleic acid core of suchparticles may act as a scaffold for the agents being delivered in vivoand/or it may act as the agent itself. An exemplary protocol forsynthesizing DNA nanoparticles is provided in the Examples.

The nanoparticles release their agent “payload” over a number of days asa function of their degradation profile in vivo. As discussed herein,the nanoparticles are biodegradable in nature and thus they graduallydegrade in an aqueous environment such as occurs in vivo. If the agentsare dispersed throughout the nanoparticles then their release will occuras the outermost layers of the nanoparticle degrade or as the poreswithin the nanoparticle enlarge. Release kinetic studies have beenperformed and they demonstrate that protein and small-molecule drugs canbe released from such nanoparticles over time-courses ranging from 1 dayto at least 2 weeks. The nanoparticles are preferably not engulfed byeither their carrier cells or other cells at the target site. Theyfunction rather by gradually releasing their payload into theenvironment of the target site(s).

The nanoparticles' diameter ranges from 1-1000 nanometers (nm). In someembodiments, their diameter ranges in size from 20-750 nm, or from20-500 nm, or from 20-250 nm. In some embodiments, their diameter rangesin size from 50-750 nm, or from 50-500 nm, or from 50-250 nm, or fromabout 100-300 nm. In some embodiments, their diameter is about 100,about 150, about 200 nm, about 250 nm, or about 300 nm. As used in thecontext of nanoparticle diameters, the term “about” means+/−5% of theabsolute value stated. Thus, it is to be understood that although theseparticles are referred to herein as nanoparticles, the invention intendsto embrace microparticles as well.

As discussed herein, the nanoparticles may be synthesized to compriseone or more reactive groups on their exterior surface for reaction withreactive groups on cell carriers (e.g., leukocytes). These nanoparticlereactive groups include without limitation thiol-reactive maleimide headgroups, haloacetyl (e.g., iodoacetyl) groups, imidoester groups,N-hydroxysuccinimide esters, pyridyl disulfide groups, and the like.These reactive groups react with groups on the carrier cell surface andthus the nanoparticles are bound to the cell surface. It will beunderstood that when surface modified in this manner, the nanoparticlesare intended for use with specific carrier cells having “complementary”reactive groups (i.e., reactive groups that react with those of thenanoparticles). In some embodiments, the nanoparticles will notintegrate into the lipid bilayer that comprises the cell surface.Typically, the nanoparticles will not be phagocytosed (or internalized)by the carrier cells.

In some embodiments the nanoparticles do not comprise antibodies orantibody fragments on their surface, while in other embodiments they do.In some embodiments the nanoparticles do not comprise antibodies orantibody fragments that are specific to T cell surface moieties (orexogenous moieties coated onto a T cell surface such other antibodies orantibody fragments), while in other embodiments they do. Thus, in someembodiments the nanoparticles themselves do not stimulate carrier cellactivation simply by binding to the carrier cell. In other embodimentshowever the nanoparticles do stimulate carrier cell activation bybinding to the carrier cell (e.g., binding of the nanoparticle resultsin crosslinking of cell surface moieties and this activates the carriercell).

The nanoparticles may be covalently conjugated (or attached or bound, asthe terms are used interchangeably herein), or they may benon-covalently conjugated to the carrier cells. Covalent conjugationtypically provides a more stable (and thus longer) association betweenthe nanoparticles and the carrier cells. Covalent conjugation in someembodiments also can provide stability and thus more sustained localizeddelivery of agents in vivo. Non-covalent conjugation includes withoutlimitation absorption onto the cell surface and/or lipid bilayer of thecell membrane.

In some instances, covalent attachment can be achieved in a two-stepprocess in which carrier cells are first incubated withmaleimide-bearing nanoparticles to allow conjugation to the cellsurface, followed by in situ PEGylation with thiol-terminatedpoly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) to cap remaining maleimide groups of theparticles and avoid particle-mediated crosslinking of cells. With thisapproach, substantial numbers of nanoparticles with diameters in the100-300 nm range have been conjugated to cell types used commonly incell therapy, including CD8⁺ T lymphocytes and lineage⁻Sca-1⁺c-kit⁺murine progenitor cells (data not shown). This strategy allows particlesranging from simple liposomes (e.g., with an aqueous drug-loaded core)to more complex lipid-coated polymer or DNA-based nanoparticles to bestably attached to live cells. Importantly, the linkage chemistry isbenign and non-toxic as evidenced in part by the conjugation of up to139 (±29)˜200 nm-diameter lipid-coated nanoparticles to the surface ofcells without any deleterious effect (data not shown).

Although liposomes and lipid-coated polymer particles are able tospontaneously adsorb to cell surfaces, in some instances covalentconjugation is preferred due to the increased stability it achieves.

Nanoparticles bound to carrier cells, such as lymphocytes orhematopoietic progenitor cells, remain localized at the cell surface asrevealed by optical sectioning with confocal microscopy, scanningelectron microscopy and by flow cytometry internalization assays, evenfollowing extended in vitro stimulation (data not shown). Phagocyticcells, such as immature dendritic cells, are able to efficientlyinternalize maleimide-functionalized nanoparticles after a shortincubation (data not shown), and thus they are not suitable as carriercells.

Exemplary synthetic polymers which can be used to form the biodegradablenanoparticles include without limitation aliphatic polyesters, poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly (glycolic acid) (PGA), co-polymers of lacticacid and glycolic acid (PLGA), polycarprolactone (PCL), polyanhydrides,poly(ortho)esters, polyurethanes, poly(butyric acid), poly(valericacid), and poly(lactide-co-caprolactone), and natural polymers such asalginate and other polysaccharides including dextran and cellulose,collagen, chemical derivatives thereof, including substitutions,additions of chemical groups such as for example alkyl, alkylene,hydroxylations, oxidations, and other modifications routinely made bythose skilled in the art), albumin and other hydrophilic proteins, zeinand other prolamines and hydrophobic proteins, copolymers and mixturesthereof. In general, these materials degrade either by enzymatichydrolysis or exposure to water in vivo, by surface or bulk erosion.

The nanoparticles also preferably comprise a lipid bilayer on theiroutermost surface. This bilayer may be comprised of one or more lipidsof the same or different type. Examples include without limitationphospholipids such as phosphocholines and phosphoinositols. Specificexamples include without limitation DMPC, DOPC, DSPC, and various otherlipids such as those recited below for liposomes.

Liposomes

The invention also contemplates the use of liposomes in place ofnanoparticles in the various embodiments described herein. Liposomes aresmall closed vesicles comprising at least one lipid bilayer and aninternal aqueous compartment. As used herein, liposomes are notnanoparticles. Liposomes may be anionic, neutral or cationic. They maybe unilamellar or multilamellar. Liposome may comprise withoutlimitation unilamellar vesicle lipids, multilamellar vesicle lipids andextruded lipids including DOTMA, DOTAP, DOTIM, DDAB, alone or togetherwith cholesterol to yield DOTMA and cholesterol, DOTAP and cholesterol,DOTIM and cholesterol, and DDAB and cholesterol. Methods for preparationof multilamellar vesicle lipids are known in the art (see for exampleU.S. Pat. No. 6,693,086, the teachings of which relating tomultilamellar vesicle lipid preparation are incorporated herein byreference). Extruded lipids are prepared in a similar manner but arethen extruded through filters of decreasing size, as described inTempleton et al., Nature Biotech, 15:647-652, 1997, the teachings ofwhich relating to extruded lipid preparation are incorporated herein byreference.

Liposomes may be surface modified during or after synthesis to includereactive groups complementary to the reactive groups on the carriercells. Such reactive groups include without limitation maleimide groups.As an example, liposomes may be synthesized to include maleimideconjugated phospholipids such as without limitation DSPE-MaL-PEG2000.

An exemplary synthesis protocol for liposomes is provided in theExamples.

Agents

The invention contemplates the delivery of agents to localized regions,tissues or cells in vivo. As used herein, an agent is any atom ormolecule or compound that can be used to provide benefit to a subject(including without limitation prophylactic or therapeutic benefit) orthat can be used for diagnosis and/or detection (for example, imaging)in vivo.

Any agent may be delivered using the methods of the invention providedthat it can be loaded into the nanoparticles provided herein. Forexample, the agent must be able to withstand the nanoparticle synthesisand optionally storage process. The nanoparticles may be synthesized andstored in, for example, a lyophilized form. The agents, if incorporatedinto the nanoparticles during synthesis, should be stable during suchstorage procedures and times.

The agent may be without limitation a protein, a polypeptide, a peptide,a nucleic acid, a virus-like particle, a steroid, a proteoglycan, alipid, a carbohydrate, and analogs, derivatives, mixtures, fusions,combinations or conjugates thereof. The agent may be a prodrug that ismetabolized and thus converted in vivo to its active (and/or stable)form.

The agents may be naturally occurring or non-naturally occurring.Naturally occurring agents include those capable of being synthesized bythe subjects to whom the nanoparticles are administered. Non-naturallyoccurring are those that do not exist in nature normally, whetherproduced by plant, animal, microbe or other living organism.

One class of agents is peptide-based agents such as (single ormulti-chain) proteins and peptides. Examples include antibodies, singlechain antibodies, antibody fragments, enzymes, co-factors, receptors,ligands, transcription factors and other regulatory factors, someantigens (as discussed below), cytokines, chemokines, and the like.These peptide-based agents may or may not be naturally occurring butthey are capable of being synthesized within the subject, for example,through the use of genetically engineered cells.

Another class of agents that can be delivered in a localized mannerusing the nanoparticles of the invention includes those agents that arenot peptide-based and which could not be synthesized by the transferredcells. Examples include chemical compounds that are non-naturallyoccurring, or chemical compounds that are not naturally synthesized bymammalian (and in particular human) cells.

A variety of agents that are currently used for therapeutic ordiagnostic purposes can be delivered according to the invention andthese include without limitation imaging agents, immunomodulatory agentssuch as immunostimulatory agents and immunoinhibitory agents, antigens,adjuvants, cytokines, chemokines, anti-cancer agents, anti-infectiveagents, nucleic acids, antibodies or fragments thereof, fusion proteinssuch as cytokine-antibody fusion proteins, Fc-fusion proteins, and thelike.

Imaging Agents.

As used herein, an imaging agent is an agent that emits signal directlyor indirectly thereby allowing its detection in vivo. Imaging agentssuch as contrast agents and radioactive agents that can be detectedusing medical imaging techniques such as nuclear medicine scans andmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Imaging agents for magnetic resonanceimaging (MRI) include Gd(DOTA), iron oxide or gold nanoparticles;imaging agents for nuclear medicine include ²⁰¹T1, gamma-emittingradionuclide 99 mTc; imaging agents for positron-emission tomography(PET) include positron-emitting isotopes, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose((18)FDG), (18)F-fluoride, copper-64, gadoamide, and radioisotopes ofPb(II) such as 203 Pb, and 11In; imaging agents for in vivo fluorescenceimaging such as fluorescent dyes or dye-conjugated nanoparticles. Inother embodiments, the agent to be delivered is conjugated, or fused to,or mixed or combined with an imaging agent.

Immunostimulatory Agents.

As used herein, an immunostimulatory agent is an agent that stimulatesan immune response (including enhancing a pre-existing immune response)in a subject to whom it is administered, whether alone or in combinationwith another agent. Examples include antigens, adjuvants (e.g., TLRligands such as imiquimod, imidazoquinoline, nucleic acids comprising anunmethylated CpG dinucleotide, monophosphoryl lipid A or otherlipopolysaccharide derivatives, single-stranded or double-stranded RNA,flagellin, muramyl dipeptide), cytokines including interleukins (e.g.,IL-2, IL-7, IL-15 (or superagonist/mutant forms of these cytokines),IL-12, IFN-gamma, IFN-alpha, GM-CSF, FLT3-ligand, etc.),immunostimulatory antibodies (e.g., anti-CTLA-4, anti-CD28, anti-CD3, orsingle chain/antibody fragments of these molecules), and the like.

Antigens.

The antigen may be without limitation a cancer antigen, a self antigen,a microbial antigen, an allergen, or an environmental antigen. Theantigen may be peptide, lipid, or carbohydrate in nature, but it is notso limited.

Cancer Antigens.

A cancer antigen is an antigen that is expressed preferentially bycancer cells (i.e., it is expressed at higher levels in cancer cellsthan on non-cancer cells) and in some instances it is expressed solelyby cancer cells. The cancer antigen may be expressed within a cancercell or on the surface of the cancer cell. The cancer antigen may beMART-1/Melan-A, gp100, adenosine deaminase-binding protein (ADAbp), FAP,cyclophilin b, colorectal associated antigen (CRC)C-017-1A/GA733,carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CAP-1, CAP-2, etv6, AML1, prostatespecific antigen (PSA), PSA-1, PSA-2, PSA-3, prostate-specific membraneantigen (PSMA), T cell receptor/CD3-zeta chain, and CD20. The cancerantigen may be selected from the group consisting of MAGE-A1, MAGE-A2,MAGE-A3, MAGE-A4, MAGE-A5, MAGE-A6, MAGE-A7, MAGE-A8, MAGE-A9, MAGE-A10,MAGE-A11, MAGE-A12, MAGE-Xp2 (MAGE-B2), MAGE-Xp3 (MAGE-B3), MAGE-Xp4(MAGE-B4), MAGE-C1, MAGE-C2, MAGE-C3, MAGE-C4, MAGE-05). The cancerantigen may be selected from the group consisting of GAGE-1, GAGE-2,GAGE-3, GAGE-4, GAGE-5, GAGE-6, GAGE-7, GAGE-8, GAGE-9. The cancerantigen may be selected from the group consisting of BAGE, RAGE, LAGE-1,NAG, GnT-V, MUM-1, CDK4, tyrosinase, p53, MUC family, HER2/neu, p21ras,RCAS1, α-fetoprotein, E-cadherin, α-catenin, β-catenin, γ-catenin,p120ctn, gp100^(Pmel117), PRAME, NY-ESO-1, cdc27, adenomatous polyposiscoli protein (APC), fodrin, Connexin 37, Ig-idiotype, p15, gp75, GM2ganglioside, GD2 ganglioside, human papilloma virus proteins, Smadfamily of tumor antigens, lmp-1, PIA, EBV-encoded nuclear antigen(EBNA)-1, brain glycogen phosphorylase, SSX-1, SSX-2 (HOM-MEL-40),SSX-1, SSX-4, SSX-5, SCP-1 and CT-7, CD20, and c-erbB-2.

Microbial Antigens.

Microbial antigens are antigens derived from microbial species such aswithout limitation bacterial, viral, fungal, parasitic and mycobacterialspecies. As such, microbial antigens include bacterial antigens, viralantigens, fungal antigens, parasitic antigens, and mycobacterialantigens. Examples of bacterial, viral, fungal, parasitic andmycobacterial species are provided herein. The microbial antigen may bepart of a microbial species or it may be the entire microbe.

Allergens.

An allergen is an agent that can induce an allergic or asthmaticresponse in a subject. Allergens include without limitation pollens,insect venoms, animal dander dust, fungal spores and drugs (e.g.penicillin). Examples of natural, animal and plant allergens include butare not limited to proteins specific to the following genera: Canine(Canis familiaris); Dermatophagoides (e.g. Dermatophagoides farinae);Felis (Felis domesticus); Ambrosia (Ambrosia artemiisfolia; Lolium (e.g.Lolium perenne or Lolium multiflorum); Cryptomeria (Cryptomeriajaponica); Alternaria (Alternaria alternata); Alder; Alnus (Alnusgultinoasa); Betula (Betula verrucosa); Quercus (Quercus alba); Olea(Olea europa); Artemisia (Artemisia vulgaris); Plantago (e.g. Plantagolanceolata); Parietaria (e.g. Parietaria officinalis or Parietariajudaica); Blattella (e.g. Blattella germanica); Apis (e.g. Apismultiflorum); Cupressus (e.g. Cupressus sempervirens, Cupressusarizonica and Cupressus macrocarpa); Juniperus (e.g. Juniperussabinoides, Juniperus virginiana, Juniperus communis and Juniperusashei); Thuya (e.g. Thuya orientalis); Chamaecyparis (e.g. Chamaecyparisobtusa); Periplaneta (e.g. Periplaneta americana); Agropyron (e.g.Agropyron repens); Secale (e.g. Secale cereale); Triticum (e.g. Triticumaestivum); Dactylis (e.g. Dactylis glomerata); Festuca (e.g. Festucaelatior); Poa (e.g. Poa pratensis or Poa compressa); Avena (e.g. Avenasativa); Holcus (e.g. Holcus lanatus); Anthoxanthum (e.g. Anthoxanthumodoratum); Arrhenatherum (e.g. Arrhenatherum elatius); Agrostis (e.g.Agrostis alba); Phleum (e.g. Phleum pratense); Phalaris (e.g. Phalarisarundinacea); Paspalum (e.g. Paspalum notatum); Sorghum (e.g. Sorghumhalepensis); and Bromus (e.g. Bromus inermis).

Adjuvants.

The adjuvant may be without limitation alum (e.g., aluminum hydroxide,aluminum phosphate); saponins purified from the bark of the Q. saponariatree such as QS21 (a glycolipid that elutes in the 21st peak with HPLCfractionation; Antigenics, Inc., Worcester, Mass.);poly[di(carboxylatophenoxy)phosphazene (PCPP polymer; Virus ResearchInstitute, USA), Flt3 ligand, Leishmania elongation factor (a purifiedLeishmania protein; Corixa Corporation, Seattle, Wash.), ISCOMS(immunostimulating complexes which contain mixed saponins, lipids andform virus-sized particles with pores that can hold antigen; CSL,Melbourne, Australia), Pam3Cys, SB-AS4 (SmithKline Beecham adjuvantsystem #4 which contains alum and MPL; SBB, Belgium), non-ionic blockcopolymers that form micelles such as CRL 1005 (these contain a linearchain of hydrophobic polyoxypropylene flanked by chains ofpolyoxyethylene, Vaxcel, Inc., Norcross, Ga.), and Montanide IMS (e.g.,IMS 1312, water-based nanoparticles combined with a solubleimmunostimulant, Seppic)

Adjuvants may be TLR ligands. Adjuvants that act through TLR3 includewithout limitation double-stranded RNA. Adjuvants that act through TLR4include wihtout limitation derivatives of lipopolysaccharides such asmonophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA; Ribi ImmunoChem Research, Inc., Hamilton,Mont.) and muramyl dipeptide (MDP; Ribi) andthreonyl-muramyl dipeptide(t-MDP; Ribi); OM-174 (a glucosamine disaccharide related to lipid A; OMPharma SA, Meyrin, Switzerland). Adjuvants that act through TLR5 includewithout limitation flagellin. Adjuvants that act through TLR7 and/orTLR8 include single-stranded RNA, oligoribonucleotides (ORN), syntheticlow molecular weight compounds such as imidazoquinolinamines (e.g.,imiquimod, resiquimod). Adjuvants acting through TLR9 include DNA ofviral or bacterial origin, or synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN),such as CpG ODN. Another adjuvant class is phosphorothioate containingmolecules such as phosphorothioate nucleotide analogs and nucleic acidscontaining phosphorothioate backbone linkages.

Immunoinhibitory Agents.

As used herein, an immunoinhibitory agent is an agent that inhibits animmune response in a subject to whom it is administered, whether aloneor in combination with another agent. Examples include steroids,retinoic acid, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, anti-CD3 antibody orantibody fragment, and other immunosuppressants.

Anti-Cancer Agents.

As used herein, an anti-cancer agent is an agent that at least partiallyinhibits the development or progression of a cancer, includinginhibiting in whole or in part symptoms associated with the cancer evenif only for the short term. Several anti-cancer agents can becategorized as DNA damaging agents and these include topoisomeraseinhibitors (e.g., etoposide, ramptothecin, topotecan, teniposide,mitoxantrone), DNA alkylating agents (e.g., cisplatin, mechlorethamine,cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, melphalan, chorambucil, busulfan,thiotepa, carmustine, lomustine, carboplatin, dacarbazine,procarbazine), DNA strand break inducing agents (e.g., bleomycin,doxorubicin, daunorubicin, idarubicin, mitomycin C), anti-microtubuleagents (e.g., vincristine, vinblastine), anti-metabolic agents (e.g.,cytarabine, methotrexate, hydroxyurea, 5-fluorouracil, floxuridine,6-thioguanine, 6-mercaptopurine, fludarabine, pentostatin,chlorodeoxyadenosine), anthracyclines, vinca alkaloids, orepipodophyllotoxins.

Examples of anti-cancer agents include without limitation Acivicin;Aclarubicin; Acodazole Hydrochloride; Acronine; Adozelesin; Aldesleukin;Altretamine; Ambomycin; Ametantrone Acetate; Aminoglutethimide;Amsacrine; Anastrozole; Anthramycin; Asparaginase; Asperlin;Azacitidine; Azetepa; Azotomycin; Batimastat; Benzodepa; Bicalutamide;Bisantrene Hydrochloride; Bisnafide Dimesylate; Bizelesin; BleomycinSulfate; Bortezomib (VELCADE); Brequinar Sodium; Bropirimine; Busulfan;Cactinomycin; Calusterone; Caracemide; Carbetimer; Carboplatin (aplatinum-containing regimen); Carmustine; Carubicin Hydrochloride;Carzelesin; Cedefingol; Chlorambucil; Cirolemycin; Cisplatin (aplatinum-containing regimen); Cladribine; Crisnatol Mesylate;Cyclophosphamide; Cytarabine; Dacarbazine; Dactinomycin; Daunorubicin;Decitabine; Dexormaplatin; Dezaguanine; Diaziquone; Docetaxel(TAXOTERE); Doxorubicin; Droloxifene; Dromostanolone; Duazomycin;Edatrexate; Eflornithine; Elsamitrucin; Enloplatin; Enpromate;Epipropidine; Epirubicin; Erbulozole; Erlotinib (TARCEVA), Esorubicin;Estramustine; Etanidazole; Etoposide; Etoprine; Fadrozole; Fazarabine;Fenretinide; Floxuridine; Fludarabine; 5-Fluorouracil; Flurocitabine;Fosquidone; Fostriecin; Gefitinib (IRESSA), Gemcitabine; Hydroxyurea;Idarubicin; Ifosfamide; Ilmofosine; Imatinib mesylate (GLEEVAC);Interferon alpha-2a; Interferon alpha-2b; Interferon alpha-n1;Interferon alpha-n3; Interferon beta-I a; Interferon gamma-I b;Iproplatin; Irinotecan; Lanreotide; Lenalidomide (REVLIMID REVIMID):Letrozole; Leuprolide; Liarozole; Lometrexol; Lomustine; Losoxantrone;Masoprocol; Maytansine; Mechlorethamine; Megestrol; Melengestrol;Melphalan; Menogaril; Mercaptopurine; Methotrexate; Metoprine;Meturedepa; Mitindomide; Mitocarcin; Mitocromin; Mitogillin; Mitomalcin;Mitomycin; Mitosper; Mitotane; Mitoxantrone; Mycophenolic Acid;Nocodazole; Nogalamycin; Ormaplatin; Oxisuran; Paclitaxel; Pemetrexed(ALIMTA), Pegaspargase; Peliomycin; Pentamustine; Pentomone; Peplomycin;Perfosfamide; Pipobroman; Piposulfan; Piritrexim Isethionate;Piroxantrone; Plicamycin; Plomestane; Porfimer; Porfiromycin;Prednimustine; Procarbazine; Puromycin; Pyrazofurin; Riboprine;Rogletimide; Safingol; Semustine; Simtrazene; Sitogluside; Sparfosate;Sparsomycin; Spirogermanium; Spiromustine; Spiroplatin; Streptonigrin;Streptozocin; Sulofenur; Talisomycin; Tamsulosin; Taxol; Taxotere;Tecogalan; Tegafur; Teloxantrone; Temoporfin; Temozolomide (TEMODAR);Teniposide; Teroxirone; Testolactone; Thalidomide (THALOMID) andderivatives thereof; Thiamiprine; Thioguanine; Thiotepa; Tiazofurin;Tirapazamine; Topotecan; Toremifene; Trestolone; Triciribine;Trimetrexate; Triptorelin; Tubulozole; Uracil Mustard; Uredepa;Vapreotide; Verteporfin; Vinblastine; Vincristine; Vindesine;Vinepidine; Vinglycinate; Vinleurosine; Vinorelbine; Vinrosidine;Vinzolidine; Vorozole; Zeniplatin; Zinostatin; Zorubicin.

The anti-cancer agent may be an enzyme inhibitor including withoutlimitation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, a CDK inhibitor, a MAP kinaseinhibitor, or an EGFR inhibitor. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor may bewithout limitation Genistein (4′,5,7-trihydroxyisoflavone), Tyrphostin25 (3,4,5-trihydroxyphenyl), methylene]-propanedinitrile, Herbimycin A,Daidzein (4′,7-dihydroxyisoflavone), AG-126,trans-1-(3′-carboxy-4′-hydroxyphenyl)-2-(2″,5″-dihydroxy-phenyl)ethane,or HDB A (2-Hydroxy5-(2,5-Dihydroxybenzylamino)-2-hydroxybenzoic acid.The CDK inhibitor may be without limitation p21, p2′7, p5′7, p15, p16,p18, or p19. The MAP kinase inhibitor may be without limitation KY12420(C₂₃H₂₄O₈), CNI-1493, PD98059, or 4-(4-Fluorophenyl)-2-(4-methylsulfinylphenyl)-5-(4-pyridyl) 1H-imidazole. The EGFR inhibitor may be withoutlimitation erlotinib (TARCEVA), gefitinib (IRESSA), WHI-P97 (quinazolinederivative), LFM-A12 (leflunomide metabolite analog), ABX-EGF,lapatinib, canertinib, ZD-6474 (ZACTIMA), AEE788, and AG1458.

The anti-cancer agent may be a VEGF inhibitor including withoutlimitation bevacizumab (AVASTIN), ranibizumab (LUCENTIS), pegaptanib(MACUGEN), sorafenib, sunitinib (SUTENT), vatalanib, ZD-6474 (ZACTIMA),anecortave (RETAANE), squalamine lactate, and semaphorin.

The anti-cancer agent may be an antibody or an antibody fragmentincluding without limitation an antibody or an antibody fragmentincluding but not limited to bevacizumab (AVASTIN), trastuzumab(HERCEPTIN), alemtuzumab (CAMPATH, indicated for B cell chroniclymphocytic leukemia), gemtuzumab (MYLOTARG, hP67.6, anti-CD33,indicated for leukemia such as acute myeloid leukemia), rituximab(RITUXAN), tositumomab (BEXXAR, anti-CD20, indicated for B cellmalignancy), MDX-210 (bispecific antibody that binds simultaneously toHER-2/neu oncogene protein product and type I Fc receptors forimmunoglobulin G (IgG) (Fc gamma RI)), oregovomab (OVAREX, indicated forovarian cancer), edrecolomab (PANOREX), daclizumab (ZENAPAX),palivizumab (SYNAGIS, indicated for respiratory conditions such as RSVinfection), ibritumomab tiuxetan (ZEVALIN, indicated for Non-Hodgkin'slymphoma), cetuximab (ERBITUX), MDX-447, MDX-22, MDX-220 (anti-TAG-72),IOR-05, IOR-T6 (anti-CD1), IOR EGF/R3, celogovab (ONCOSCINT OV103),epratuzumab (LYMPHOCIDE), pemtumomab (THERAGYN), and Gliomab-H(indicated for brain cancer, melanoma).

Hematopoietic Differentiating Agents.

The agent may be one that stimulates the differentiation ofhematopoietic progenitor cells towards one or more lineages. Examplesinclude without limitation IL-3, G-CSF, GM-CSF, M-CSF, thrombopoeitin,erythropoietin, Wnt5A, Wnt11A, and the like.

Hematopoietic Self-Renewing Agents.

The agent may be one that stimulates the self-renewal of hematopoieticprogenitor cells. Examples include without limitation kit ligand,GSK3-beta inhibitors, Wnt5A together with SLF, Notch1 activators, Lnkinhibitors, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and agents that stimulate the PGE2pathway including PGE2, PGI2, Linoleic Acid, 13(s)-HODE, LY171883, MeadAcid, Eicosatrienoic Acid, Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acid, ONO-259, Cay1039, aPGE2 receptor agonist, of 16,16-dimethyl PGE2, 19(R)-hydroxy PGE2,16,16-dimethyl PGE2 p-(p-acetamidobenzamido) phenyl ester,11-deoxy-16,16-dimethyl PGE2,9-deoxy-9-methylene-16,16-dimethyl PGE2,9-deoxy-9-methylene PGE2, Butaprost, Sulprostone, PGE2 serinol amide,PGE2 methyl ester, 16-phenyl tetranor PGE2,15(S)-15-methylPGE2,15(R)-15-methyl PGE2, BIO, 8-bromo-cAMP, Forskolin, Bapta-AM,Fendiline, Nicardipine, Nifedipine, Pimozide, Strophanthidin,Lanatoside, L-Arg, Sodium Nitroprusside, Sodium Vanadate, Bradykinin,Mebeverine, Flurandrenolide, Atenolol, Pindolol, Gaboxadol, KynurenicAcid, Hydralazine, Thiabendazole, Bicuclline, Vesamicol, Peruvoside,Imipramine, Chlorpropamide, 1,5-Pentamethylenetetrazole,4-Aminopyridine, Diazoxide, Benfotiamine, 12-Methoxydodecenoic acid,N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe, Gallamine, IAA 94, Chlorotrianisene, andderivatives thereof, and the like.

Anti-Infective Agents.

The agent may be an anti-infective agent including without limitation ananti-bacterial agent, an anti-viral agent, an anti-parasitic agent, ananti-fungal agent, and an anti-mycobacterial agent.

Anti-bacterial agents may be without limitation β-lactam antibiotics,penicillins (such as natural penicillins, aminopenicillins,penicillinase-resistant penicillins, carboxy penicillins, ureidopenicillins), cephalosporins (first generation, second generation, andthird generation cephalosporins), other β-lactams (such as imipenem,monobactams), β-lactamase inhibitors, vancomycin, aminoglycosides andspectinomycin, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, lincomycin,clindamycin, rifampin, metronidazole, polymyxins, sulfonamides andtrimethoprim, or quinolines.

Other anti-bacterials may be without limitation Acedapsone; AcetosulfoneSodium; Alamecin; Alexidine; Amdinocillin; Amdinocillin Pivoxil;Amicycline; Amifloxacin; Amifloxacin Mesylate; Amikacin; AmikacinSulfate; Aminosalicylic acid; Aminosalicylate sodium; Amoxicillin;Amphomycin; Ampicillin; Ampicillin Sodium; Apalcillin Sodium; Apramycin;Aspartocin; Astromicin Sulfate; Avilamycin; Avoparcin; Azithromycin;Azlocillin; Azlocillin Sodium; Bacampicillin Hydrochloride; Bacitracin;Bacitracin Methylene Disalicylate; Bacitracin Zinc; Bambermycins;Benzoylpas Calcium; Berythromycin; Betamicin Sulfate; Biapenem;Biniramycin; Biphenamine Hydrochloride; Bispyrithione Magsulfex;Butikacin; Butirosin Sulfate; Capreomycin Sulfate; Carbadox;Carbenicillin Disodium; Carbenicillin Indanyl Sodium; CarbenicillinPhenyl Sodium; Carbenicillin Potassium; Carumonam Sodium; Cefaclor;Cefadroxil; Cefamandole; Cefamandole Nafate; Cefamandole Sodium;Cefaparole; Cefatrizine; Cefazaflur Sodium; Cefazolin; Cefazolin Sodium;Cefbuperazone; Cefdinir; Cefepime; Cefepime Hydrochloride; Cefetecol;Cefixime; Cefmenoxime Hydrochloride; Cefmetazole; Cefmetazole Sodium;Cefonicid Monosodium; Cefonicid Sodium; Cefoperazone Sodium; Ceforanide;Cefotaxime Sodium; Cefotetan; Cefotetan Disodium; CefotiamHydrochloride; Cefoxitin; Cefoxitin Sodium; Cefpimizole; CefpimizoleSodium; Cefpiramide; Cefpiramide Sodium; Cefpirome Sulfate; CefpodoximeProxetil; Cefprozil; Cefroxadine; Cefsulodin Sodium; Ceftazidime;Ceftibuten; Ceftizoxime Sodium; Ceftriaxone Sodium; Cefuroxime;Cefuroxime Axetil; Cefuroxime Pivoxetil; Cefuroxime Sodium; CephacetrileSodium; Cephalexin; Cephalexin Hydrochloride; Cephaloglycin;Cephaloridine; Cephalothin Sodium; Cephapirin Sodium; Cephradine;Cetocycline Hydrochloride; Cetophenicol; Chloramphenicol;Chloramphenicol Palmitate; Chloramphenicol Pantothenate Complex;Chloramphenicol Sodium Succinate; Chlorhexidine Phosphanilate;Chloroxylenol; Chlortetracycline Bisulfate; ChlortetracyclineHydrochloride; Cinoxacin; Ciprofloxacin; Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride;Cirolemycin; Clarithromycin; Clinafloxacin Hydrochloride; Clindamycin;Clindamycin Hydrochloride; Clindamycin Palmitate Hydrochloride;Clindamycin Phosphate; Clofazimine; Cloxacillin Benzathine; CloxacillinSodium; Cloxyquin; Colistimethate Sodium; Colistin Sulfate; Coumermycin;Coumermycin Sodium; Cyclacillin; Cycloserine; Dalfopristin; Dapsone;Daptomycin; Demeclocycline; Demeclocycline Hydrochloride; Demecycline;Denofungin; Diaveridine; Dicloxacillin; Dicloxacillin Sodium;Dihydrostreptomycin Sulfate; Dipyrithione; Dirithromycin; Doxycycline;Doxycycline Calcium; Doxycycline Fosfatex; Doxycycline Hyclate; DroxacinSodium; Enoxacin; Epicillin; Epitetracycline Hydrochloride;Erythromycin; Erythromycin Acistrate; Erythromycin Estolate;Erythromycin Ethylsuccinate; Erythromycin Gluceptate; ErythromycinLactobionate; Erythromycin Propionate; Erythromycin Stearate; EthambutolHydrochloride; Ethionamide; Fleroxacin; Floxacillin; Fludalanine;Flumequine; Fosfomycin; Fosfomycin Tromethamine; Fumoxicillin;Furazolium Chloride; Furazolium Tartrate; Fusidate Sodium; Fusidic Acid;Gentamicin Sulfate; Gloximonam; Gramicidin; Haloprogin; Hetacillin;Hetacillin Potassium; Hexedine; Ibafloxacin; Imipenem; Isoconazole;Isepamicin; Isoniazid; Josamycin; Kanamycin Sulfate; Kitasamycin;Levofuraltadone; Levopropylcillin Potassium; Lexithromycin; Lincomycin;Lincomycin Hydrochloride; Lomefloxacin; Lomefloxacin Hydrochloride;Lomefloxacin Mesylate; Loracarbef; Mafenide; Meclocycline; MeclocyclineSulfosalicylate; Megalomicin Potassium Phosphate; Mequidox; Meropenem;Methacycline; Methacycline Hydrochloride; Methenamine; MethenamineHippurate; Methenamine Mandelate; Methicillin Sodium; Metioprim;Metronidazole Hydrochloride; Metronidazole Phosphate; Mezlocillin;Mezlocillin Sodium; Minocycline; Minocycline Hydrochloride; MirincamycinHydrochloride; Monensin; Monensin Sodium; Nafcillin Sodium; NalidixateSodium; Nalidixic Acid; Natamycin; Nebramycin; Neomycin Palmitate;Neomycin Sulfate; Neomycin Undecylenate; Netilmicin Sulfate;Neutramycin; Nifuradene; Nifuraldezone; Nifuratel; Nifuratrone;Nifurdazil; Nifurimide; Nifurpirinol; Nifurquinazol; Nifurthiazole;Nitrocycline; Nitrofurantoin; Nitromide; Norfloxacin; Novobiocin Sodium;Ofloxacin; Ormetoprim; Oxacillin Sodium; Oximonam; Oximonam Sodium;Oxolinic Acid; Oxytetracycline; Oxytetracycline Calcium; OxytetracyclineHydrochloride; Paldimycin; Parachlorophenol; Paulomycin; Pefloxacin;Pefloxacin Mesylate; Penamecillin; Penicillin G Benzathine; Penicillin GPotassium; Penicillin G Procaine; Penicillin G Sodium; Penicillin V;Penicillin V Benzathine; Penicillin V Hydrabamine; Penicillin VPotassium; Pentizidone Sodium; Phenyl Aminosalicylate; PiperacillinSodium; Pirbenicillin Sodium; Piridicillin Sodium; PirlimycinHydrochloride; Pivampicillin Hydrochloride; Pivampicillin Pamoate;Pivampicillin Probenate; Polymyxin B Sulfate; Porfiromycin; Propikacin;Pyrazinamide; Pyrithione Zinc; Quindecamine Acetate; Quinupristin;Racephenicol; Ramoplanin; Ranimycin; Relomycin; Repromicin; Rifabutin;Rifametane; Rifamexil; Rifamide; Rifampin; Rifapentine; Rifaximin;Rolitetracycline; Rolitetracycline Nitrate; Rosaramicin; RosaramicinButyrate; Rosaramicin Propionate; Rosaramicin Sodium Phosphate;Rosaramicin Stearate; Rosoxacin; Roxarsone; Roxithromycin; Sancycline;Sanfetrinem Sodium; Sarmoxicillin; Sarpicillin; Scopafungin; Sisomicin;Sisomicin Sulfate; Sparfloxacin; Spectinomycin Hydrochloride;Spiramycin; Stallimycin Hydrochloride; Steffimycin; StreptomycinSulfate; Streptonicozid; Sulfabenz; Sulfabenzamide; Sulfacetamide;Sulfacetamide Sodium; Sulfacytine; Sulfadiazine; Sulfadiazine Sodium;Sulfadoxine; Sulfalene; Sulfamerazine; Sulfameter; Sulfamethazine;Sulfamethizole; Sulfamethoxazole; Sulfamonomethoxine; Sulfamoxole;Sulfanilate Zinc; Sulfanitran; Sulfasalazine; Sulfasomizole;Sulfathiazole; Sulfazamet; Sulfisoxazole; Sulfisoxazole Acetyl;Sulfisoxazole Diolamine; Sulfomyxin; Sulopenem; Sultamicillin; SuncillinSodium; Talampicillin Hydrochloride; Teicoplanin; TemafloxacinHydrochloride; Temocillin; Tetracycline; Tetracycline Hydrochloride;Tetracycline Phosphate Complex; Tetroxoprim; Thiamphenicol;Thiphencillin Potassium; Ticarcillin Cresyl Sodium; TicarcillinDisodium; Ticarcillin Monosodium; Ticlatone; Tiodonium Chloride;Tobramycin; Tobramycin Sulfate; Tosufloxacin; Trimethoprim; TrimethoprimSulfate; Trisulfapyrimidines; Troleandomycin; Trospectomycin Sulfate;Tyrothricin; Vancomycin; Vancomycin Hydrochloride; Virginiamycin; orZorbamycin.

Anti-mycobacterial agents may be without limitation Myambutol(Ethambutol Hydrochloride), Dapsone (4,4′-diaminodiphenylsulfone), PaserGranules (aminosalicylic acid granules), Priftin (rifapentine),Pyrazinamide, Isoniazid, Rifadin (Rifampin), Rifadin IV, Rifamate(Rifampin and Isoniazid), Rifater (Rifampin, Isoniazid, andPyrazinamide), Streptomycin Sulfate or Trecator-SC (Ethionamide).

Anti-viral agents may be without limitation amantidine and rimantadine,ribivarin, acyclovir, vidarabine, trifluorothymidine, ganciclovir,zidovudine, retinovir, and interferons.

Anti-viral agents may be without limitation further include Acemannan;Acyclovir; Acyclovir Sodium; Adefovir; Alovudine; Alvircept Sudotox;Amantadine Hydrochloride; Aranotin; Arildone; Atevirdine Mesylate;Avridine; Cidofovir; Cipamfylline; Cytarabine Hydrochloride; DelavirdineMesylate; Desciclovir; Didanosine; Disoxaril; Edoxudine; Enviradene;Enviroxime; Famciclovir; Famotine Hydrochloride; Fiacitabine;Fialuridine; Fosarilate; Foscarnet Sodium; Fosfonet Sodium; Ganciclovir;Ganciclovir Sodium; Idoxuridine; Kethoxal; Lamivudine; Lobucavir;Memotine Hydrochloride; Methisazone; Nevirapine; Penciclovir; Pirodavir;Ribavirin; Rimantadine Hydrochloride; Saquinavir Mesylate; SomantadineHydrochloride; Sorivudine; Statolon; Stavudine; Tilorone Hydrochloride;Trifluridine; Valacyclovir Hydrochloride; Vidarabine; VidarabinePhosphate; Vidarabine Sodium Phosphate; Viroxime; Zalcitabine;Zidovudine; Zinviroxime or integrase inhibitors.

Anti-fungal agents may be without limitation imidazoles and triazoles,polyene macrolide antibiotics, griseofulvin, amphotericin B, andflucytosine. Antiparasites include heavy metals, antimalarialquinolines, folate antagonists, nitroimidazoles, benzimidazoles,avermectins, praxiquantel, ornithine decarboxylase inhbitors, phenols(e.g., bithionol, niclosamide); synthetic alkaloid (e.g.,dehydroemetine); piperazines (e.g., diethylcarbamazine); acetanilide(e.g., diloxanide furonate); halogenated quinolines (e.g., iodoquinol(diiodohydroxyquin)); nitrofurans (e.g., nifurtimox); diamidines (e.g.,pentamidine); tetrahydropyrimidine (e.g., pyrantel pamoate); or sulfatednaphthylamine (e.g., suramin).

Other anti-infective agents may be without limitation DifloxacinHydrochloride; Lauryl Isoquinolinium Bromide; Moxalactam Disodium;Ornidazole; Pentisomicin; Sarafloxacin Hydrochloride; Proteaseinhibitors of HIV and other retroviruses; Integrase Inhibitors of HIVand other retroviruses; Cefaclor (Ceclor); Acyclovir (Zovirax);Norfloxacin (Noroxin); Cefoxitin (Mefoxin); Cefuroxime axetil (Ceftin);Ciprofloxacin (Cipro); Aminacrine Hydrochloride; Benzethonium Chloride:Bithionolate Sodium; Bromchlorenone; Carbamide Peroxide; CetalkoniumChloride; Cetylpyridinium Chloride: Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride;Clioquinol; Domiphen Bromide; Fenticlor; Fludazonium Chloride; Fuchsin,Basic; Furazolidone; Gentian Violet; Halquinols; Hexachlorophene:Hydrogen Peroxide; Ichthammol; Imidecyl Iodine; Iodine; IsopropylAlcohol; Mafenide Acetate; Meralein Sodium; Mercufenol Chloride;Mercury, Ammoniated; Methylbenzethonium Chloride; Nitrofurazone;Nitromersol; Octenidine Hydrochloride; Oxychlorosene; OxychloroseneSodium; Parachlorophenol, Camphorated; Potassium Permanganate;Povidone-Iodine; Sepazonium Chloride; Silver Nitrate; Sulfadiazine,Silver; Symclosene; Thimerfonate Sodium; Thimerosal; or TroclosenePotassium.

Nucleic Acid Agents.

Nucleic acids that can be delivered to a subject according to theinvention include naturally or non-naturally occurring DNA (includingcDNA, genomic DNA, nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA), RNA (including mRNA,rRNA, tRNA), oligonucleotides, a triple-helix forming molecule,immunostimulatory nucleic acids such as those described in U.S. Pat. No.6,194,388 (the teachings of which relating to immunostimulatory CpGnucleic acids are incorporated herein by reference), small interferingRNA (siRNA) used to modulate gene expression, antisense oligonucleotidesused to modulate gene expression, aptamers, ribozymes, a gene or genefragment, a regulatory sequence, including analogs, derivatives, andcombinations thereof. These nucleic acids may be administered neat orcomplexed to another entity, for example in order to facilitate theirbinding to and/or uptake by target tissues and/or cells.

Other Agents.

The agent may be without limitation adrenergic agent; adrenocorticalsteroid; adrenocortical suppressant; alcohol deterrent; aldosteroneantagonist; ammonia detoxicant; amino acid; amylotropic lateralsclerosis agent; anabolic; analeptic; analgesic; androgen; anesthetic;anorectic; anorexic; anterior pituitary activator; anterior pituitarysuppressant; anthelmintic; anti-acne agent; anti-adrenergic;anti-allergic; anti-amebic; anti-androgen; anti-anemic; anti-anginal;anti-anxiety; anti-arthritic; anti-asthmatic including β-adrenergicagonists, methylxanthines, mast cell stabilizing agents,anticholinergics, adrenocortical steroids such as glucocorticoids;anti-atherosclerotic; anticholelithic; anticholelithogenic;anticholinergic; anticoagulant; anticoccidal; anticonvulsant;antidepressant; antidiabetic; antidiarrheal; antidiuretic; antidote;antidyskinetic; anti-emetic; anti-epileptic; anti-estrogen;antifibrinolytic; antiglaucoma; antihemorrhagic; antihemorrheologic;antihistamine; antihyperlipidemic; antihyperlipoproteinemic;antihypertensive; antihypotensive; anti-infective; anti-inflammatory;antikeratinizing agent; antimigraine; antimitotic; antimycotic;antinauseant; antineutropenic; antiobsessional agent; antioxidant;antiparkinsonian; antiperistaltic; antipneumocystic; antiprostatichypertrophy agent; antiprotozoal; antipruritic; antipsoriatic;antipsychotic; antirheumatic; antischistosomal; antiseborrheic;antisecretory; antispasmodic; antithrombotic; antitussive;anti-ulcerative; anti-urolithic; appetite suppressant; blood glucoseregulator; bone resorption inhibitor; bronchodilator; carbonic anhydraseinhibitor; cardiac depressant; cardioprotectant; cardiotonic;cardiovascular agent; cerebral ischemia agent; choleretic; cholinergic;cholinergic agonist; cholinesterase deactivator; coccidiostat; cognitionadjuvant; cognition enhancer; conjunctivitis agent; contrast agent;depressant; diagnostic aid; diuretic; dopaminergic agent;ectoparasiticide; emetic; enzyme inhibitor; estrogen; estrogen receptoragonist; fibrinolytic; fluorescent agent; free oxygen radical scavenger;gastric acid suppressant; gastrointestinal motility effector; geriatricagent; glucocorticoid; gonad-stimulating principle; hair growthstimulant; hemostatic; herbal active agent; histamine H2 receptorantagonists; hormone; hypocholesterolemic; hypoglycemic; hypolipidemic;hypotensive; HMGCoA reductase inhibitor; impotence therapy adjunct;inflammatory bowel disease agent; keratolytic; LHRH agonist; liverdisorder agent; luteolysin; memory adjuvant; mental performanceenhancer; mineral; mood regulator; mucolytic; mucosal protective agent;multiple sclerosis agent; mydriatic; nasal decongestant; neuroleptic;neuromuscular blocking agent; neuroprotective; NMDA antagonist;non-hormonal sterol derivative; nutrient; oxytocic; Paget's diseaseagent; plasminogen activator; platelet activating factor antagonist;platelet aggregation inhibitor; post-stroke and post-head trauma agents;progestin; prostaglandin; prostate growth inhibitor; prothyrotropin;psychotropic; radioactive agent; relaxant; rhinitis agent; scabicide;sclerosing agent; sedative; sedative-hypnotic; selective adenosine A1antagonist; sequestering agents; serotonin antagonist; serotonininhibitor; serotonin receptor antagonist; steroid; stimulant;suppressant; thyroid hormone; thyroid inhibitor; thyromimetic;tranquilizer; unstable angina agent; uricosuric; vasoconstrictor;vasodilator; vulnerary; wound healing agent; or xanthine oxidaseinhibitor.

Subjects

The invention can be practiced in virtually any subject type that islikely to benefit from localized delivery of agents as contemplatedherein. Human subjects are preferred subjects in some embodiments of theinvention. Subjects also include animals such as household pets (e.g.,dogs, cats, rabbits, ferrets, etc.), livestock or farm animals (e.g.,cows, pigs, sheep, chickens and other poultry), horses such asthoroughbred horses, laboratory animals (e.g., mice, rats, rabbits,etc.), and the like. Subjects also include fish and other aquaticspecies.

The subjects to whom the agents are delivered may be normal subjects.Alternatively they may have or may be at risk of developing a conditionthat can be diagnosed or that can benefit from localized delivery of oneor more particular agents.

Such conditions include cancer (e.g., solid tumor cancers), infections(particularly infections localized to particular regions or tissues inthe body), autoimmune disorders, allergies or allergic conditions,asthma, transplant rejection, and the like.

Tests for diagnosing various of the conditions embraced by the inventionare known in the art and will be familiar to the ordinary medicalpractitioner. These laboratory tests include without limitationmicroscopic analyses, cultivation dependent tests (such as cultures),and nucleic acid detection tests. These include wet mounts,stain-enhanced microscopy, immune microscopy (e.g., FISH), hybridizationmicroscopy, particle agglutination, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays,urine screening tests, DNA probe hybridization, serologic tests, etc.The medical practitioner will generally also take a full history andconduct a complete physical examination in addition to running thelaboratory tests listed above.

A subject having a cancer is a subject that has detectable cancer cells.A subject at risk of developing a cancer is a subject that has a higherthan normal probability of developing cancer. These subjects include,for instance, subjects having a genetic abnormality that has beendemonstrated to be associated with a higher likelihood of developing acancer, subjects having a familial disposition to cancer, subjectsexposed to cancer causing agents (i.e., carcinogens) such as tobacco,asbestos, or other chemical toxins, and subjects previously treated forcancer and in apparent remission.

Subjects having an infection are those that exhibit symptoms thereofincluding without limitation fever, chills, myalgia, photophobia,pharyngitis, acute lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, gastrointestinalupset, leukocytosis or leukopenia, and/or those in whom infectiouspathogens or byproducts thereof can be detected.

A subject at risk of developing an infection is one that is at risk ofexposure to an infectious pathogen. Such subjects include those thatlive in an area where such pathogens are known to exist and where suchinfections are common. These subjects also include those that engage inhigh risk activities such as sharing of needles, engaging in unprotectedsexual activity, routine contact with infected samples of subjects(e.g., medical practitioners), people who have undergone surgery,including but not limited to abdominal surgery, etc.

The subject may have or may be at risk of developing an infection suchas a bacterial infection, a viral infection, a fungal infection, aparasitic infection or a mycobacterial infection. In these embodiments,the nanoparticles may comprise an anti-microbial agent such as ananti-bacterial agent, an anti-viral agent, an anti-fungal agent, ananti-parasitic agent, or an anti-mycobacterial agent and the cellcarriers (e.g., the T cells) may be genetically engineered to produceanother agent useful in stimulating an immune response against theinfection, or potentially treating the infection.

In some instances, the subjects to whom the carrier cell-nanoparticleconjugates are administered are in need of hematopoietic reconstitution.Such subjects may have been exposed to a deliberate or accidentalmyeloablative event, including without limitation myeloablativechemotherapy and/or whole body radiation, as may be given as part of atherapeutic regimen for non-solid cancers or metastatic cancers. Theinvention contemplates administering to such subjects hematopoieticprogenitor cells conjugated to nanoparticles that comprise agentscapable of stimulating the proliferation of the progenitor cells. Insome instances, the agents may also be differentiating agents (i.e.,agents that drive the progenitor cells and their progeny todifferentiate, optionally towards all lineages or a subset of lineages.In other instances, the agents may be self-renewal agents (i.e., agentsthat drive the progenitor cells to self-renew). In yet other instances,the carrier cells may be conjugated to nanoparticles that comprise bothtypes of agents, whether such agents be in the same nanoparticle or indifferent nanoparticles. Moreover, the invention further contemplatesthat exposure of the subject to these different agents may be staggered(e.g., exposure to the self-renewing agents may occur before exposure tothe differentiating agents).

Cancer

The invention contemplates administration of the nanoparticle-cellconjugates to subjects having or at risk of developing a cancerincluding for example a solid tumor cancer. The cancer may be carcinoma,sarcoma or melanoma. Carcinomas include without limitation to basal cellcarcinoma, biliary tract cancer, bladder cancer, breast cancer, cervicalcancer, choriocarcinoma, CNS cancer, colon and rectum cancer, kidney orrenal cell cancer, larynx cancer, liver cancer, small cell lung cancer,non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, including adenocarcinoma, giant (oroat) cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma), oral cavity cancer,ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, skin cancer(including basal cell cancer and squamous cell cancer), stomach cancer,testicular cancer, thyroid cancer, uterine cancer, rectal cancer, cancerof the respiratory system, and cancer of the urinary system.

Sarcomas are rare mesenchymal neoplasms that arise in bone(osteosarcomas) and soft tissues (fibrosarcomas). Sarcomas includewithout limitation liposarcomas (including myxoid liposarcomas andpleiomorphic liposarcomas), leiomyosarcomas, rhabdomyosarcomas,malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (also called malignantschwannomas, neurofibrosarcomas, or neurogenic sarcomas), Ewing's tumors(including Ewing's sarcoma of bone, extraskeletal (i.e., not bone)Ewing's sarcoma, and primitive neuroectodermal tumor), synovial sarcoma,angiosarcomas, hemangiosarcomas, lymphangiosarcomas, Kaposi's sarcoma,hemangioendothelioma, desmoid tumor (also called aggressivefibromatosis), dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), malignant fibroushistiocytoma (MFH), hemangiopericytoma, malignant mesenchymoma, alveolarsoft-part sarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, desmoplasticsmall cell tumor, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) (also known asGI stromal sarcoma), and chondrosarcoma.

Melanomas are tumors arising from the melanocytic system of the skin andother organs. Examples of melanoma include without limitation lentigomaligna melanoma, superficial spreading melanoma, nodular melanoma, andacral lentiginous melanoma.

The cancer may be a solid tumor lymphoma. Examples include Hodgkin'slymphoma, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and B cell lymphoma.

The cancer may be without limitation bone cancer, brain cancer, breastcancer, colorectal cancer, connective tissue cancer, cancer of thedigestive system, endometrial cancer, esophageal cancer, eye cancer,cancer of the head and neck, gastric cancer, intra-epithelial neoplasm,melanoma neuroblastoma, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, non-small cell lungcancer, prostate cancer, retinoblastoma, or rhabdomyosarcoma.

Infection

The invention contemplates administration of the nanoparticle-cellconjugates to subjects having or at risk of developing an infection suchas a bacterial infection, a viral infection, a fungal infection, aparasitic infection or a mycobacterial infection.

The bacterial infection may be without limitation an E. coli infection,a Staphylococcal infection, a Streptococcal infection, a Pseudomonasinfection, Clostridium difficile infection, Legionella infection,Pneumococcus infection, Haemophilus infection, Klebsiella infection,Enterobacter infection, Citrobacter infection, Neisseria infection,Shigella infection, Salmonella infection, Listeria infection,Pasteurella infection, Streptobacillus infection, Spirillum infection,Treponema infection, Actinomyces infection, Borrelia infection,Corynebacterium infection, Nocardia infection, Gardnerella infection,Campylobacter infection, Spirochaeta infection, Proteus infection,Bacteroides infection, H. pylori infection, or anthrax infection.

The mycobacterial infection may be without limitation tuberculosis orleprosy respectively caused by the M. tuberculosis and M. lepraespecies.

The viral infection may be without limitation a Herpes simplex virus 1infection, a Herpes simplex virus 2 infection, cytomegalovirusinfection, hepatitis A virus infection, hepatitis B virus infection,hepatitis C virus infection, human papilloma virus infection, EpsteinBarr virus infection, rotavirus infection, adenovirus infection,influenza A virus infection, H1N1 (swine flu) infection, respiratorysyncytial virus infection, varicella-zoster virus infections, small poxinfection, monkey pox infection, SARS infection or avian flu infection.

The fungal infection may be without limitation candidiasis, ringworm,histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, paracoccidioidomycosis, crytococcosis,aspergillosis, chromomycosis, mycetoma infections, pseudallescheriasis,or tinea versicolor infection.

The parasite infection may be without limitation amebiasis, Trypanosomacruzi infection, Fascioliasis, Leishmaniasis, Plasmodium infections,Onchocerciasis, Paragonimiasis, Trypanosoma brucei infection,Pneumocystis infection, Trichomonas vaginalis infection, Taeniainfection, Hymenolepsis infection, Echinococcus infections,Schistosomiasis, neurocysticercosis, Necator americanus infection, orTrichuris trichiura infection.

Allergy and Asthma

The invention contemplates administration of the nanoparticle-cellconjugates to subjects having or at risk of developing an allergy orasthma. An allergy is an acquired hypersensitivity to an allergen.Allergic conditions include but are not limited to eczema, allergicrhinitis or coryza, hay fever, bronchial asthma, urticaria (hives) andfood allergies, and other atopic conditions. Allergies are generallycaused by IgE antibody generation against harmless allergens. Asthma isa disorder of the respiratory system characterized by inflammation,narrowing of the airways and increased reactivity of the airways toinhaled agents. Asthma is frequently, although not exclusively,associated with atopic or allergic symptoms. Administration of Th1cytokines, such as IL-12 and IFN-gamma, according to the invention canbe used to treat allergy or asthma.

Autoimmune Disease

The invention contemplates administration of the nanoparticle-cellconjugates to subjects having or at risk of developing an autoimmunedisease. Autoimmune disease is a class of diseases in which a subject'sown antibodies react with host tissue or in which immune effector Tcells are autoreactive to endogenous self peptides and cause destructionof tissue. Thus an immune response is mounted against a subject's ownantigens, referred to as self antigens. Autoimmune diseases aregenerally considered to be Th1 biased. As a result, induction of a Th2immune response or Th2 like cytokines can be beneficial. Such cytokinesinclude IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10.

Autoimmune diseases include but are not limited to rheumatoid arthritis,Crohn's disease, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE),autoimmune encephalomyelitis, myasthenia gravis (MG), Hashimoto'sthyroiditis, Goodpasture's syndrome, pemphigus (e.g., pemphigusvulgaris), Grave's disease, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, autoimmunethrombocytopenic purpura, scleroderma with anti-collagen antibodies,mixed connective tissue disease, polymyositis, pernicious anemia,idiopathic Addison's disease, autoimmune-associated infertility,glomerulonephritis (e.g., crescentic glomerulonephritis, proliferativeglomerulonephritis), bullous pemphigoid, Sjögren's syndrome, insulinresistance, and autoimmune diabetes mellitus.

Transplant Therapy

The methods provided herein may also be used to modulate immuneresponses following transplant therapy. Transplant success is oftenlimited by rejection of the transplanted tissue by the body's immunesystem. As a result, transplant recipients are usually immunosuppressedfor extended periods of time in order to allow the transplanted tissueto survive. The invention contemplates localized delivery ofimmunomodulators, and particularly immunoinhibitory agents, totransplant sites in order to minimize transplant rejection. Thus, theinvention contemplates administration of the nanoparticle-cellconjugates to subjects that are going to undergo, are undergoing, orhave undergone a transplant.

The foregoing lists are not intended to be exhaustive but ratherexemplary. Those of ordinary skill in the art will identify otherexamples of each condition type that are amenable to prevention andtreatment using the methods of the invention.

Effective Amounts, Regimens, Formulations

The agents are administered in effective amounts. An effective amount isa dosage of the agent sufficient to provide a medically desirableresult. The effective amount will vary with the particular conditionbeing treated, the age and physical condition of the subject beingtreated, the severity of the condition, the duration of the treatment,the nature of the concurrent or combination therapy (if any), thespecific route of administration and like factors within the knowledgeand expertise of the health practitioner. It is preferred generally thata maximum dose be used, that is, the highest safe dose according tosound medical judgment.

For example, if the subject has a tumor, an effective amount may be thatamount that reduces the tumor volume or load (as for example determinedby imaging the tumor). Effective amounts may also be assessed by thepresence and/or frequency of cancer cells in the blood or other bodyfluid or tissue (e.g., a biopsy). If the tumor is impacting the normalfunctioning of a tissue or organ, then the effective amount may beassessed by measuring the normal functioning of the tissue or organ.

The invention provides pharmaceutical compositions. Pharmaceuticalcompositions are sterile compositions that comprise cells, nanoparticlesand/or agent(s), preferably in a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier.The term “pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier” means one or morecompatible solid or liquid filler, diluents or encapsulating substanceswhich are suitable for administration to a human or other subjectcontemplated by the invention. The term “carrier” denotes an organic orinorganic ingredient, natural or synthetic, with which the cells,nanoparticles and agent(s) are combined to facilitate administration.The components of the pharmaceutical compositions are commingled in amanner that precludes interaction that would substantially impair theirdesired pharmaceutical efficiency.

The nanoparticle-cell conjugates, when it is desirable to deliver themsystemically, may be formulated for parenteral administration byinjection, e.g., by bolus injection or continuous infusion. Formulationsfor injection may be presented in unit dosage form, e.g., in ampoules orin multi-dose containers. Pharmaceutical parenteral formulations includeaqueous solutions of the ingredients. Aqueous injection suspensions maycontain substances which increase the viscosity of the suspension, suchas sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, sorbitol, or dextran. Alternatively,suspensions of ingredients may be prepared as oil-based suspensions.Suitable lipophilic solvents or vehicles include fatty oils such assesame oil, or synthetic fatty acid esters, such as ethyl oleate ortriglycerides, or liposomes.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Nanoparticle Synthesis, Characterization andConjugation to T Cells

1.1. Nanoparticle Synthesis.

We recently developed a strategy to prepare ‘lipid-enveloped’biodegradable polymer nanoparticles. (Bershteyn A et al., Soft Matter 4:1787, 2008.) These particles have a biodegradablepoly(lactide-co-glycolide) core and a surface coating of a phospholipidbilayer (FIGS. 2A and B, arrows). These nanoparticles can encapsulatedrug molecules in their core and/or incorporate drugs in the surfacelipid bilayer, enabling sustained release of proteins, peptides, orsmall-molecule compounds. Nanoparticles were synthesized by a doubleemulsion/solvent evaporation process: 200 μL water was emulsified in 1mL chloroform containing 2 mg of a lipid mixture (4:1 mole:moleDOPC:DOPG with varying quantities of dioleoyl maleimidophenylphosphoethanolamine (MPB PE), with or without 25 μg1,1′-dioctacdecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindodicarbocyanine (DiD) or DiRlipid-like fluorescent dye (Invitrogen)) and 30 mgpoly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA, 50:50 wt:wt lactide:glycolide, 13 KDa,Lakeshore biopolymers). Inclusion of the maleimide-headgroup MPB PElipid in the lipid fraction enables cell conjugation, as describedbelow. The resulting water-in-oil emulsion was sonicated on ice (1 min,7 Watts with a Misonix Microson XL probe tip sonicator) then added to 6mL deionized water on ice with sonication (5 min, 12 Watts), forming awater-in oil-in water double emulsion. Chloroform was evaporated fromthe double emulsion by stirring at 20° C. under atmospheric pressure for6 hrs to form solid nanoparticles. During solvent evaporation, thelipids in the organic phase self-assemble at the oil-water interface andform a bilayer coating around the nascent PLGA-core particles (FIGS. 2Aand B); excess lipid is also present in the particle bulk. The particleswere purified from free lipid by centrifugation through a 60 wt %sucrose cushion, dialyzed to remove sucrose, and stored at 4° C. (shortterm storage) or lyophilized in the presence of trehalose and stored at4° C. until used. Simple variations in the processing conditions (e.g.,use of homogenization instead of sonication) allowed particles ofdifferent size to be prepared, as determined by dynamic light scattering(DLS, data not shown).

To synthesize DNA-gel nanoparticles, we first generated four-armed DNAjunctions, X-DNA monomers, by annealing the following oligonucleotides(Integrated DNA Technology, IDT):

1) (SEQ ID NO: 2) 5′-p-ACGTCGACCGATGAATAGCGGTCAGATCCGTACCTACTCG-3′ 2)(SEQ ID NO: 3) 5′-p-ACGTCGAGTAGGTACGGATCTGCGTATTGCGAACGACTCG-3′ 3)(SEQ ID NO: 4) 5′-p-ACGTCGAGTCGTTCGCAATACGGCTGTACGTATGGTCTCG-3′ 4)(SEQ ID NO: 5) 5′-p-ACGTCGAGACCATACGTACAGCACCGCTATTCATCGGTCG-3′

These oligos self-assemble into three-dimensional “X” nanostructureswith complementary overhangs at the end or each arm. As recentlydescribed (Um et al., Nat Mater, 5:797, 2006), addition of ligase to asolution of these DNA macromers leads to covalent crosslinking and theformation of DNA-base hydrogels. To form nanoparticles, 1.667 mg X-DNAmonomer was then admixed to 6.7 μl T4 DNA ligase (3 Weiss units/μl,Promega), 20 μl T4 ligase buffer (Promega) and nuclease-free water (IDT)to a total volume of 200 μl, which was subsequently vortexed with a drylipid film containing 0.396 mg DOPC, 0.101 mg DOPG, 0.63 mg MPB and 0.04mg DiD. The resulting DNA gel-lipid mixture was sonicated on ice (5 mintotal, alternating power cycles of 1 W and 5 Watts every 30 s with aMisonix Microson XL probe tip sonicator), and extruded 21 times througha polycarbonate filter (200 nm pore size, Whatman). Following a 3 hourincubation at 25° C. and overnight incubation at 4° C. to allowligase-mediated X-DNA crosslinking, 4 μl Exonuclease III (New EnglandBiolabs), 20 μl Buffer 1 (New England Biolabs) and nuclease-free waterto a total volume of 200 μl was were added and incubated at 37° C. for90 minutes. DNA-gel nanoparticles were purified from free lipids and DNAby centrifugation through a 10 wt % sucrose cushion, and washed threetimes with nuclease-free water. A typical yield of 10¹⁰ DNA gelnanoparticles in the 200-250 nm diameter range was measured using a90Plus Particles Size Analyzer (Brookhaven Instruments).

For IL-15Sa/IL-21 encapsulation in DNA-gel nanoparticles, 30 μgrecombinant mouse IL-15Rα/Fc chimera (R&D systems) was precomplexed with10 μg mouse IL-15 (Peprotech) in nuclease-free water for 1 hour at roomtemperature to generate superagonist IL-15 (IL-15Sa), combined with 10μg mouse IL-21 (Peprotech) and blended with the X-DNA/T4 ligase mixturefor DNA-gel particle synthesis, following the procedure described above.

For DNA-gel nanoparticle loading with the GSK3-β inhibitor TWS119(Cayman Chemical), 1 mg TWS was resuspended in 250 μl DMSO, beforeadding it to the X-DNA/T4 ligase mixture for DNA-gel particle synthesis.

1.2. Nanoparticle Characterization.

Characterization of the nanoparticles by DLS and cryoelectron microscopyshowed that the mean particle diameter obtained from this process is161±74 nm (FIG. 2C). Labeling of PLGA-core or liposome nanoparticleswith lipid-like dyes such as carbocyanine dyes (DiD, Invitrogen) allowedthe particles to be easily detected in confocal microscopy or flowcytometry analysis of particle-decorated cells (illustrated in the datadiscussed below).

1.3. TCR-Transgenic System for Modeling Adoptive Cell Therapy in MurineMelanoma.

To develop and test the concepts proposed here, we used the pmel-1TCR-transgenic mouse/B16F10 murine melanoma system developed at the NCIas a model of adoptive cell therapy for melanoma. Pmel-1 CD8⁺ T cellsexpress a T cell receptor which recognizes a peptide from murine gp100,a melanoma self-antigen expressed by B16 melanoma tumor cells that isalso used as a T cell target in human melanoma vaccines. (Overwijk etal., J Exp Med 198(4): 569, 2003; Klebanoff et al., Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 102(27): 9571, 2005; Overwijk et al., J Exp Med 188(2): 277, 1998.)Pmel-1 mice develop T cells tolerized to this antigen, mimicking what isthought to be a common situation in the immune response to humancancers, although these cells can be activated and expanded by primingthem with an altered peptide ligand, a peptide from human gp100.(Overwijk et al., J Exp Med 198(4): 569, 2003.) This model serves as amimic of human ACT where tolerance must be broken to fully prime theimmune response following adoptive transfer of expanded T cells intorecipient tumor-bearing mice.

1.4. Coupling of Nanoparticles to Live T Cells Through Free SurfaceThiols.

Having developed a strategy for preparation of lipid-coated particles,we next performed a number of studies using ‘blank’ nanoparticles (noencapsulated cytokine/TLR ligand compounds) to evaluate the prospects ofthis approach. We first tested whether nanoparticles could be simplyadsorbed to T cell surfaces stably, by incubating cells withnanoparticles at varying particle:cell ratios for different durations at4° C. or 37° C. Though PLGA-core nanoparticles could be adsorbed tocells (in varying quantities, depending on the surface charge of thenanoparticles used), we found that in some instances physical adsorptiondid not provide very stable binding to the cells, and an increasingfraction of nanoparticles was removed from the cells during repeatedwashing as assessed by flow cytometry analysis of tagged cells (notshown). It is to be understood however that in some embodiments linkageof nanoparticles to carrier cells through non-covalent absorption may besufficient for the particular application. This may be useful forexample in the delivery of antigen-loaded nanoparticles that may betransferred to antigen presenting cells in lymphoid organs afteradministration and appropriate homing.

To obtain more stable binding of particles to T cells, we developed anon-toxic strategy to covalently link the lipid-coated nanoparticles toT cells. We exploited the substantial amounts of free thiols availableon cell-surface proteins of leukocytes. (Sahaf et al., Proc Natl AcadSci USA 100(7): 4001, 2003.) We conjugated maleimide-functionalized dyes(which react with thiols to form stable thioether linkages) tofreshly-isolated T cells and analyzed the cells by flow cytometry. Tcells, B cells and hematopoietic progenitor cells (e.g., murine Lin⁻,Sca-1⁺, c-kit⁺ cells) were found to have high levels of free thiols atthe cell surface, though red blood cells did not (not shown).

Based on these results, we developed the strategy outlined in FIG. 2D.Nanoparticle carriers were prepared which included lipids withmaleimide-terminated headgroups. CD8⁺ T cells were isolated from spleensof pmel-1 TCR-transgenic using magnetic bead negative selection(Miltenyi Biotec) and expanded for 4 days in vitro usinganti-CD3/anti-CD28-coated beads in the presence of 200 IU/mL human IL-2,mimicking the preparation of tumor-specific T cells for adoptive celltherapy. T cells were washed and incubated (60×10⁶ cells/mL) withmaleimide-functionalized-nanoparticles (at varying concentrations) at37° C. for 45 min at varying particle:cell ratios. Cells were thenseparated from unbound particles by gentle centrifugation. Residualmaleimide groups present on particles bound to the T cells were quenchedby incubation of the cells (3×10⁶/mL) with 1 mg/mL thiol-terminated 2KDa poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG, Laysan Bio) at 37° C. for 30 min incomplete RPMI medium, followed by two washes to remove unbound PEG. Byvarying the amount of maleimide-lipid incorporated, we found that 50mole % maleimide in the lipid fraction provided optimal binding to Tcells and retention of particles through multiple washes (not shown).

As shown in FIG. 3A, nanoparticles were readily attached to cells usingthis thiol-reaction strategy. 2500 nanoparticles per cell duringconjugation as shown in FIG. 3 gave ˜500 nanoparticles bound per cell asdetermined from particle counting at high magnification in confocalmicroscopy; this corresponds to a theoretical occlusion of ˜3.2% of theaverage T cell surface area by 160 nm diameter particles. T cellscultured in IL-2 showed a dilution of the density of nanoparticles boundto the cells over the course of a week, due to proliferation of thecells (FIG. 3A, day 6). Conjugation of nanoparticles to cells at thisdensity led to no loss of T cell viability over a week in culture (FIG.3B), and also did not trigger spontaneous activation of these cells.

A key issue for these studies was the localization of the particles. Ifthe cells internalize these particles then encapsulated drug cargos maynot be released into the local microenvironment and/or drugs releasedfrom the nanoparticles may be unable to access their target receptors onthe T cell itself. Importantly, we found that T cells do not internalizelipid-coated PLGA nanoparticles (illustrated by FIG. 3A), even duringextended culture or following proliferation (discussed further below).This is in stark contrast to what we observed with dendritic cells,which phagocytosed the attached nanoparticles within minutes.

Example 2 Assessment of Nanoparticle Binding on T Cell Functions

2.1. Nanoparticles Bound to Cells Do Not Block Antigen Recognition or TCell Proliferation.

Having found that thiol coupling allowed stable non-toxic linkage ofnanoparticles to cells, we next sought to determine whether the couplingreaction interfered with T cell behavior, and to find what dose ofnanoparticles could be attached to T cells without blocking key T cellfunctions. We first tested whether T cell proliferation was impacted bynanoparticle coupling. Pmel-1 T cells were primed/expanded in vitro withanti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads and IL-2 as described above. The expanded cellswere labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE), andincubated with 2500 DiD-labeled lipid-coated PLGA nanoparticles per cellfor conjugation. In parallel, day 6 bone marrow-derived dendritic cellsfrom C57Bl/6 mice prepared as described (Stachowiak et al., J Immunol177(4): 2340, 2006) were activated by incubation with 1 μM CpGoligonucleotide (a ligand for TLR 9) and pulsed with 1 μM hgp100₂₅₋₃₃peptide (a peptide recognized by pmel-1 T cells in the context ofH-2D^(b) MHC I molecules) overnight. Nanoparticle-conjugated or control‘bare’ T cells were co-cultured with activated antigen-loaded DCs at a2:1 T:DC ratio for 6 days, and then analyzed by flow cytometry. As shownin FIG. 4A, the degree of proliferation of control andnanoparticle-conjugated T cells as determined by CFSE dilution in thedividing cells was indistinguishable. In addition, analysis of the meanfluorescence from nanoparticles bound to cells showed a steady declinein nanoparticle fluorescence as the number of cell divisions increased,reflecting segregation of particles to separate daughter cells duringdivision. Notably, when sorted CFSE-low divided cells were examined inconfocal microscopy, nanoparticles were found to still be surfacelocalized even on cells that had undergone 5 cell divisions.

2.2. High Densities of Nanoparticles can be Bound to T Cells withoutInhibiting Cytokine Secretion or CTL Activity.

Activated CD8⁺ T cells secrete cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α anddirectly kill antigen-bearing target cells as part of their anti-tumoractivity. To determine whether conjugation of lipid-coated PLGAnanoparticles to T cells interferes with cytokine secretion,particle-conjugated or control T cells were co-cultured withantigen-pulsed DCs as described above, and the production of several keycytokines by the T cells was assessed by ELISA. As shown in FIG. 4B,pmel-1 T cells decorated with nanoparticles produced equivalent amountsof IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α in response to antigen stimulation asunmodified ‘bare’ T cells. Thus, substantial quantities of nanoparticlescan be bound to cells without blocking effector cytokine secretion.

We next carried out a dose response analysis to determine the maximaldose of nanoparticles could be attached to T cells without inhibitingcytolytic activity of the lymphocytes. Pmel-1 T cells were expanded invitro as before, and then incubated with varying doses of lipid-coatedPLGA nanoparticles per cell ranging from 100 nanoparticles/cell up to10,000 nanoparticles per cell for particle conjugation. Particle-taggedor control T cells were then co-cultured with ⁵¹Cr-labeled EL4 targetcells pulsed with hgp100₂₅₋₃₃ peptide at varying effector:target ratiosfor 4 hrs at 37° C. in complete medium. Specific target cell lysis wasdetermined by measurement of radioactive chromium released into theculture supernatant. As shown in FIG. 4C, target cell killing bynanoparticle-conjugated T cells was indistinguishable from control Tcells except at the two highest coupling doses tested (10,000 or 5000nanoparticles/cell).

2.3. TCR-Transgenic OT-1 CD8+ T Cell Analysis.

Similar results were found with other T cells. TCR-transgenic OT-1 CD8⁺T cells, which are specific for a peptide derived from ovalbumin, andwhich were conjugated with up to 100 (±21) nanoparticles per cell, fullyretained their physiological proliferative response after co-culturewith ovalbumin-pulsed target dendritic cells. In some instances, highersurface densities of the same nanoparticles began to inhibit T cellproliferation (data not shown). During cell division, surface-attachednanoparticles segregated equally to daughter cells, which was reflectedby a stepwise decrease in the mean fluorescent signal fromcell-conjugated nanoparticles with increasing number of cell divisions(data not shown). Attachment of up to ˜100 particles/cell also did notimpact T cell recognition/killing of ovalbumin peptide-pulsed targetcells or cytokine release profiles (data not shown).

In summary, for conditions of up to 2500 nanoparticles/cell duringconjugation (nanoparticles with diameters ˜160 nm), no inhibition of Tcell antigen recognition, proliferation, cytokine secretion, or targetcell killing is observed. These results together suggest thatsubstantial quantities of submicron-sized nanoparticles can be attachedto T cells without blocking key cell functions.

Example 3 Cytokine/Drug Loading in Lipid-Coated PLGA Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles are conjugated to ACT T cells in two different ways: (i)nanoparticles are loaded with cytokines designed to act on the carrier Tcells themselves to support their proliferation, survival and effectorfunction (e.g., IL-15 superagonist) or (ii) nanoparticles will be usedto deliver compounds designed to act on other cells in themicroenvironment, including Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands and vaccineantigens (e.g., imiquimod or MPLA). In the previous studies, ‘empty’nanoparticles were used to assess the impact of particle conjugation onT cell functions. Here we tested the encapsulation/incorporation ofproteins (e.g., IL-15 superagonist) and TLR ligands into thenanoparticles, in order to deliver therapeutically relevant cargos.

PLGA nanoparticles have been explored in numerous prior studies asvehicles for encapsulation and delivery of proteins, peptides, and smallmolecule drug compounds, and notably vaccine antigens/adjuvants. (DavisM E et al., Nat Rev Drug Discov 7(9): 771, 2008; Chacon Metal.,International Journal of Pharmaceutics 141(1-2): 81, 1996; Diwan M etal., Curr Drug Deliv 1(4): 405, 2004; Elamanchili P et al., Vaccine22(19): 2406, 2004; Li Y et al., J Control Release 71(2): 203, 2001;Zhang Z P et al., Biomaterials 28(10): 1889, 2007; Heit A et al., Eur JImmunol 37(8): 2063, 2007.) We first tested whether proteinencapsulation was facile in our lipid-coated nanoparticles by addingprotein to the inner aqueous phase of the double emulsion synthesis: 200μL water in the synthesis protocol described in section 3.1 was replacedwith 200 μL of a solution of the model protein Alexa488-labeledovalbumin (100 μg in PBS), and particles were prepared and purified asbefore. As shown in FIG. 5A, ova fluorescence was clearly detected innanoparticles by confocal microscopy, and cryoEM imaging of thenanoparticles showed that the particle morphology was not disrupted byprotein encapsulation and the surface lipid layer was retained forprotein-loaded particles (FIG. 5B). Measurement of the amount of proteinencapsulated was performed by lysing the nanoparticles for 4 hrs in 0.02M NaOH/2% SDS, neutralizing the solution with 0.2 M HCl, and measuringreleased ova fluorescence calibrated against ova solution standardsexposed to the same base treatment conditions. By these measurements, wefound that ˜1 μg of ova per mg nanoparticles was encapsulated (˜25%encapsulation efficiency).

Ova however is a model globular protein and as such it was chosen toillustrate the behavior of other proteins such as interleukin-15 (IL-15)superagonist molecules which can be used to support ACT T cells. Weencapsulated IL-15 (cytokine alone) in lipid-coated PLGA to test thefeasibility of cytokine loading in these particles. IL-15 (5 μg) in PBSwas used in the inner aqueous phase of the particle synthesis, and theresulting cytokine-loaded particles were purified as described insection 3.1. The kinetics of IL-15 release from the particles wasdetermined by incubating the particles in complete RPMI mediumcontaining 10% FCS at 37° C. with gentle agitation and taking aliquotsof the supernatant at staggered timepoints for ELISA analysis ofcytokine content. As shown in FIG. 5B, ˜80% of the encapsulated cytokinewas released by the end of this incubation period. Other experimentswith ova-loaded nanoparticles showed continuous release of protein overa similar 7-10-day period. Thus, the lipid-coated particles can beloaded with protein and release encapsulated material over a ˜1 weekperiod. The release kinetics can be modulated to faster or slower ratesby altering the MW of the PLGA used in the particles.

Having found that cytokines can be successfully encapsulated andreleased from nanoparticles, we tested whether survival of T cells invitro could be enhanced by cytokines released from nanoparticles. Pmel-1T cells were primed/expanded in vitro with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads andIL-2 as described above. The expanded cells were incubated with 2500lipid-coated PLGA nanoparticles per cells for conjugation. Thenanoparticles were formulated with 10 mg of IL-15 or IL-15 and IL-15Rα.Particle-conjugated or control T cells were then co-cultured with EL4target cells pulsed with hgp100₂₅₋₃₃ peptide at effector:target ratiosof 20:1 at 37° C. in complete medium without exogenous IL-2 supplement.After 6 days of culture, the number of live T cells was counted aftertrypan blue staining to assess proliferation and survival of T cells. Asshown in FIG. 6, nanoparticles encapsulating IL-15 and IL-15/IL-15Rαsignificantly enhanced survival and/or proliferation T cells compared tono treatment or empty nanoparticle groups. Proliferation observed in Tcells tagged with cytokine-encapsulated nanoparticles was comparable tosoluble IL15 and IL-15/IL-15Rα controls. Thus, IL-15 or its superagonistcomplexed with IL-15Rα continuously released from nanoparticles maintainits bioactivity and is able to support T cell survival and/orproliferation in vitro.

Nanoparticles were also loaded with the TLR4 ligand MPLA and/or the TLR7ligand, imiquimod, as potent clinically-relevant ligands for driving DCactivation during T cell adoptive therapy. MPLA is a syntheticlipopolysaccharide mimic that has shown promise as a nontoxic analog ofthe potent immunostimulant lipopolysaccharide (LPS). MPLA providesadjuvant activity in vaccines comparable to LPS but has orders ofmagnitude reduced systemic toxicity due to its selective engagement ofdownstream signals in the TLR4 signaling pathway. (Mata-Haro et al.,Science 316(5831): 1628, 2007.) Notably, LPS and its derivatives haveshown promise in breaking tolerance to tumors, and beneficial effects ofwhole-body irradiation observed during adoptive T cell therapy studieshave been in part ascribed to LPS and other TLR signaling occurring whenthe integrity of the gut epithelium is compromised. (Yang et al., NatImmunol 5(5): 508, 2004; Paulos et al., Clin Cancer Res 13(18 Pt 1):5280, 2007; Paulos et al., J Clin Invest 117(8): 2197, 2007.)

Imiquimod, a small-molecule imidazoquinoline ligand for TLR7/8, is apromising pro-immunity factor for cancer therapy approved for clinicaluse as a topical cream in the treatment of certain skin cancers. Inaddition to its pro-immunity activation of macrophages and dendriticcells (Hemmi et al., Nat Immunol 3(2): 196, 2002), imiquimod hasrecently been reported to activate tumor-local dendritic cells to adirect tumor-killing phenotype in humans. (Stary et al., J Exp Med204(6): 1441, 2007.)

Imiquimod and MPLA however share challenges in their application forcancer therapy. Systemic imiquimod delivered orally has showndose-limiting toxicity in humans (Goldstein et al., J Infect Dis 178(3):858, 1998) and has a short half-life following injection of only ˜2 hrs(Soria et al., Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 38(10): 476, 2000). Topicaladministration of imiquimod however has not been shown to be effectivein systemic metastases or non-cutaneous cancers. Both TLR4 and TLR7 havebroad expression patterns (expressed at low levels in endothelial cellsand by epithelial cells (Fan et al., J Clin Invest 112(8): 1234, 2003;Gunzer et al., Blood 106(7): 2424, 2005)), raising concerns of systemictoxicity in prolonged treatment. TLR4 and TLR7 ligands however have beenshown to induce expression of ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and selectins onendothelial cells (Gunzer et al., Blood 106(7): 2424, 2005), and sucheffects if locally stimulated at tumor sites could be used to enhance Tcell trafficking into tumors. Thus, selective delivery of these ligandsto tumor sites and secondary lymphoid organs might be used to enhancetheir anti-tumor activity while limiting systemic side effects.

In parallel with protein encapsulation experiments, we thus also testedincorporation of the Toll-like receptor ligand monophosphoryl lipid A(MPLA) in lipid-coated PLGA. Due to its lipid-like structure, MPLA isquantitatively incorporated into the particles by simply co-dissolvingthis ligand with the other phospholipids in the chloroform phase of theparticle synthesis. To test the ability of MPLA incorporated inlipid-coated PLGA nanoparticles to activate dendritic cells (whichexpress the LPS receptor, TLR4), nanoparticles containing 1 mole % or 10mole % MPLA as part of the lipid fraction of the synthesis were added tobone marrow-derived DCs for 24 hrs, and then the surface expression ofclass II MHC molecules and costimulatory receptors was analyzed by flowcytometry. DCs stained with antibodies against MHCII, CD80, and CD40showed upregulation of these markers when treated with MPLA-containingnanoparticles comparable to DCs treated with 1 μg/mL LPS as a positivecontrol; ‘blank’ nanoparticles however triggered no DC maturation (FIG.5C). Thus, TLR ligands incorporated in the lipid-coated nanoparticlesare capable of activating DCs.

Gardiquimod and resiquimod are imidazoquinoline derivatives that,similar to imiquimod, are selective ligands for TLR7/8. Gardiquimod andresiquimod have been suggested to have more potent effect thanimiquimod, based on findings that they induce stronger cytokineproduction, macrophage activation, and enhanced cellular immunity (Wageret al., Cell Immunol 191(1):10, 1999; Burns et al., Clin Immunol94(1):13, 2004; Schon et al., Oncogene 27(2): 109, 2008.) Encapsulationof gardiquimod and resiquimod and detection of their release from PLGAnanoparticles were carried out with minor modifications. Forencapsulation of gardiquimod in nanoparticles, 200 μL water in thesynthesis protocol described in section 3.1 was replaced with 1.8 mg ofgardiquimod dissolved in 200 μL of water, and for encapsulation ofresiquimod, 0.83 mg of resiquimod was dissolved along with 30 mg of PLGAin organic solvent; the rest of nanoparticle synthesis protocol outlinedin section 3.1 was followed thereafter. The kinetics of drug releasefrom the particles was determined by incubating the particles in waterwith gentle agitation at room temperature and taking aliquots of thesupernatant at staggered timepoints for fluorescent detection of drugrelease at excitation/emission of 260/340 nm. As shown in FIG. 7,continuous release of gardiquimod and resiquimod from nanoparticles wasobserved over 8 days of incubation.

Example 4 Whole Animal Imaging Reagents for Independently Tracking TumorCells, Nanoparticles, and T Cells In Vivo

The data described in the previous two sections demonstrate the protocolwe have developed to attach nanoparticles to T cells in a nontoxicmanner that does not interfere with key T cell functions. The particlescan be loaded with protein or TLR ligands as therapeutic cargos thatwill be explored in the proposed research. A final key function thatnanoparticle conjugation must not interrupt is migration/tissue homingof T cells. We first tested in vitro migration of particle-conjugated Tcell blasts plated on glass coverslips. As shown in FIG. 8A, migrating Tcells observed in time-lapse videomicroscopy polarizedcell-surface-bound nanoparticles to the uropod during migration, butwhen cells halted migration, the particles re-dispersed over the cellsurface (‘arrested cell’). Thus, particle-conjugated cells are able tomigrate and rearward polarization of the nanoparticles during motilitymay help reduce the likelihood that the particles will interfere withthe patrolling function of these cells in vivo.

We next assessed the impact of cell surface-tethered nanoparticles onthe ability of their cellular carrier to transmigrate across endothelialbarriers, as a measure of the ability of the cell carrier to infiltrateits target tissue. We utilized an in vitro transwell co-culture systemin which unmanipulated or nanoparticle-conjugated effector T lymphocytesmigrate from the upper chamber across a membrane-supported confluentTNF-α activated endothelial monolayer towards in response to a T cellchemoattractant placed in the lower chamber. Unaltered T cells carrying100 nanoparticles/cell exhibited unaltered transmigration efficienciescompared to unmodified cells (data not shown). After crossing theendothelial barrier, T lymphocytes still had retained 83% (±3%) of theoriginal nanoparticle cargo physically attached. Confocal imagingrevealed that T cells migrating on the endothelial layer polarized to acharacteristic “hand-mirror” morphology, and localized theirnanoparticle pool to the uropod (data not shown), likely reflecting theuropodal localization of many cell surface proteins on migrating Tcells.

Further experiments were conducted to show that particle-conjugated Tcells can home to their expected tissue sites, and for therapy that suchcells can enter solid tumors as effectively as unmodified T cells. Toaid in these studies, we use multicolor bioluminescence/fluorescencewhole-animal imaging to simultaneously track the location ofnanoparticles, adoptively-transferred T cells, and tumor cells. Theseexperiments are performed using a Xenogen IVIS Spectrumbioluminescence/fluorescence imaging instrument located in the KochCancer Institute core facilities at MIT.

As shown in FIG. 8B, lipid-coated PLGA nanoparticles labeled with DiRdye are readily detected in whole-animal fluorescence followingsubcutaneous injection, due to the low absorption of near-IR excitationlight used for this dye (exc 750 nm/em 790 nm). In an in vivo homingexperiment, nanoparticles with surface-conjugated recombinant Gaussialuciferase were prepared. Pmel-1 T cells were then coupled with theseluciferase-decorated nanoparticles and injected i.v. (via tail vein)into a recipient C57Bl/6 mouse. Whole-animal bioluminescence imagingfollowing the injection of the Gaussia luciferase substratecoelentarizine 4 hrs after T cell transfer via tail vein injection isshown in FIG. 8C. At this timepoint, a majority of T cells are stilllocalized in the lungs as previously reported for effector T cells(Hamann A et al., Eur J Immunol 30(11): 3207, 2000) but nanoparticle/Tcell signatures were also detected at flank sites that may reflecthoming to inguinal lymph nodes and small intense spots ofbioluminescence were detected next to the lungs (white arrows) that mayreflect initial homing to axillary/brachial lymph nodes.

Because the nanoparticles can be tracked using near-IR dyes andfluorescence, we crossed pmel-1 TCR-transgenic mice withluciferase-transgenic mice, to obtain pmel-1-luc mice where the pmel-1CD8⁺ T cells express firefly luciferase (data not shown). In parallel,Gaussia-luciferase-expressing B16F10 melanoma cells were prepared byretroviral transfection of B16 cells with a luciferase construct. Asillustrated in FIG. 8D, the B16-gaussia luc cells were readily detectedvia bioluminescence imaging.

To assess the potential of tumor-reactive T lymphocytes to vehiclesurface-conjugated nanoparticles into the microenvironment ofestablished tumors, we adoptively transferred CD8 Pmel-1 effector Tcells, T cell receptor-transgenic for the melanoma antigen gp-100, intohosts with established B16F10 tumors in their right femur (FIG. 9A).Animals were treated with 15×10⁶ Pmel-1 T lymphocytes, transgenic forFirefly luciferase for in vivo bioluminescent T cell tracking. T cellswere either conjugated to nanoparticles tagged with the fluorescent dyeDiD (right panels) or left unmodified (left panels). In both treatmentgroups, we incubated infused T lymphocytes with Thiol-PEG to avoidnonspecific phagocytosis of nanoparticles by macrophages and dendriticcells. Infused T cells of both groups displayed rapid and effectivehoming to the tumor site, as monitored by bioluminescent T cells imagingon day 4 after T cell transfer (FIG. 9B). Notably, the ex vivo surfaceconjugation of nanoparticles to T cells, did neither alter their in vivomigration nor did it constrain their potential to recognize tumorantigen. Tumor-homing T cells, furthermore, efficiently aggregatedsurface-conjugated nanoparticles at the tumor site, as shown by thelargely amplified fluorescent DiD signal of the isolated righttumor-infiltrated femur, compared to the left tumor-free femur (FIG. 9C,right panel). Importantly, nanoparticles at the tumor site were stillphysically linked to tumor-infiltrating T cells, as measured bymulticolor flow cytometry of tumor single cell suspensions (FIG. 9D). Inessence, we demonstrate that tumor-targeted T lymphocytes effectivelyshuttle therapeutic nanoparticles to the tumor site. The ex-vivo surfaceconjugation does not impair T cell viability, migration or tumorrecognition and, therefore, offers novel prospect for the targetedbiodistribution of nanoparticles and the functional enhancement oftumor-reactive T lymphocytes.

We next evaluated the migratory and tumor-homing properties ofnanoparticle-conjugated lymphocytes in an another murine model system.C57Bl/6 mice were injected with EL4 tumor cells expressingmembrane-bound Gaussia luciferase (extG-luc) and ovalbumin (EG7-OVA)s.c. on the right flank and control tumors EL4 cells expressing extG-lucalone on the left flank. Tumors were allowed to establish and then micethen received adoptive transfers of Firefly luciferase(F-luc)-transgenic OT-1 T cells with or without surface-conjugatedred-fluorescent DNA-gel nanoparticles, or an i.v. injection of anequivalent dose of fluorescent particles alone. Particle-carrying OT-1 Tcells specifically trafficked to pre-established EL4-OVA tumors (FIG.10A). No difference in the tumor homing potential of particle-conjugatedcompared to plain unmodified OT-1 T cells was observed (FIG. 10B, leftpanel). Quantitative fluorescent particle imaging of EG7-OVA tumorsdemonstrated that nanoparticles accumulated a mean 176-fold moreefficiently at the tumor site when surface-attached to OT-1 T cellscompared to systemically infused free nanoparticles, which were rapidlyscavenged by the liver and the spleen (FIG. 10B). Flow cytometryanalysis verified that T cell infiltration of EG7-OVA tumors wasquantitatively identical for particle-decorated and control OT-1 cells,and that the majority of particle-conjugated cells recovered from tumorsstill retained their nanoparticle cargo (FIG. 10A).

The benefit of tumor-antigen-specific T lymphocytes as cellular vectorsfor active nanoparticle delivery was also evidenced in a spontaneousprostate cancer model (i.e., the TRAMP prostate adenocarcinoma model).In this model system, prostate tumor-specific T cells loaded withDNA-gel nanoparticles efficiently homed to antigen-expressinghyperplastic TRAMP prostates and aggregated surface-linked fluorescentparticles at the tumor site, whereas no fluorescent nanoparticle signalabove background was detected in the prostate following systemicinjection of an equivalent particle dose (FIG. 11A-C).

The ability of lymphocytes to efficiently transfer surface-tetherednanoparticles across endothelial barriers in vivo was not restricted tothe abnormal, leaky and discontinuous endothelial lining found in tumorvasculature. When DNA-gel particles were linked to resting CCR7⁺CD62L⁺ Bcells (FIGS. 12A-C) or central memory CD8⁺ T cells (data not shown),particles were transported across the intercellular boundaries of highendothelial venules into lymph nodes, a poorly accessible compartmentfor systemically infused free nanoparticles. FIGS. 12D-F show thebiodistribution profile of nanoparticles conjugated to B cells versusfree nanoparticles, the presence of nanoparticles on B cells harvestedfrom subjects, and the localization of administered B cells andconjugated nanoparticles to lymph nodes.

In the studies above, nanoparticles without therapeutic cargo wereappended to cells possessing a defined tissue tropism to demonstrate theutility of therapeutic cells as highly efficient vectors fornanoparticle delivery to otherwise difficult-to-access anatomicalcompartments.

We next tested whether cell-bound drug-loaded nanoparticles coulddirectly impart amplified therapeutic functions to their cellularcarriers, using a murine model of adoptive T cell therapy for melanoma(Overwijk et al., J Exp Med, 188:277, 1998). We encapsulated a mixtureof IL-15, (converted to a superagonist (IL-15Sa) by pre-complexing withsoluble IL-15Rα (Rubinstein et al., PNAS USA, 103:9166, 2006)), incombination with IL-21 into lipid-coated DNA-gel particles. IL-15 andIL-21 are known to cooperatively promote in vivo T cell expansion andeffector function when administered daily at high doses. DNA-gelparticles ˜200 nm in diameter efficiently entrapped the IL-15Sa/IL-21cytokine mixture and displayed slow release kinetics over a 7-day period(data not shown). These cytokine-loaded particles were conjugated toClick bettle red (CBR)-luciferase expressing CD8⁺ Pmel-1 effector Tcells which recognize a peptide from the melanocyte differentiationantigen gp100. Particle-conjugated or control T cells were infused intolympho-depleted mice bearing established Gaussia luciferase-expressingB16F10 melanoma lung tumors (FIG. 13A). Serial imaging of non-conjugatedPmel-1 T cells showed a gradual CBR-luc signal decline following T cellinjection, consistent with poor in vivo T cell expansion and persistence(FIGS. 13B and C). Whereas a single systemic infusion of 5 μg freeIL-15Sa/IL-21 (4.03 μg IL-15Sa+0.93 μg IL-21) given on the day ofadoptive transfer did not significantly boost Pmel-1 proliferation(1.4-fold-higher CBR-luc signal on day 6, P=0.32), the same cytokinedose loaded in surface-attached nanoparticles conferred markedlyamplified proliferative capabilities on Pmel-1 T cells (81-fold higherpeak photon count relative to unmodified Pmel-1 T cells on day 6,P<0.0001, FIGS. 13A and C). Subsequent to a contraction period,IL-15Sa/IL-21 nanoparticle-carrying T cells displayed enhanced long-termpersistence (14.8-fold and 4.7-fold higher photon count than Pmel-1 Tcells alone at 16 and 30 days after T cell infusion, respectively,P<0.0001) and homed as CD44⁺CD62L⁺ central memory T cells to lymph nodesand spleen (FIGS. 13A and B, and data not shown). There was no evidenceof progressive T cell clonality or leukemia formation in any treatedanimal imaged at late time points (data not shown). Pmel-1 T cellsconjugated with “empty” nanoparticles exhibited the sameexpansion/decline in vivo as unmodified Pmel-1 cells (data not shown).All mice receiving IL-15Sa/IL-21 nanoparticle-decorated Pmel-1 T cellsachieved complete tumor clearance (FIGS. 13A and D), whereas treatmentwith Pmel-1 T cells with or without systemic IL-15Sa/IL-21 infusion atthe same doses yielded only modest survival advantages (FIG. 13D).

Example 5 Conjugation of Nanoparticles to Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells

We further examined the utility of this delivery approach in the contextof hematopoietic stem cell transplantations. We treated C57Bl/6F-luc-transgenic mice or C57Bl/6 GFP-transgenic mice with 5-fluorouracil(5-FU, Sigma Aldrich) (150 mg/kg, i.p) and euthanized them 3 days later.Bone marrow cells were removed aseptically from femurs and tibias. Bonemarrow was pre-enriched for progenitor cells using a lineage depletionkit (Miltenyi). A subsequent positive selection with anti-Sca-1microbeads (Miltenyi) resulted in an average 92% purity oflin⁻Sca⁻1⁺c-kit⁺ HSCs. Cells were kept in serum-free StemSpan (Stem CellTechnologies) for 3 hours before further modification.

1×10⁴ unmodified or nanoparticle-decorated HSCs were transplanted byretroorbital injection into lethally irradiated (1300 cGy of total bodyirradiation from a ¹³⁷Cs source as a split dose with 3-hr intervalbetween) nontransgenic recipients.

For in vitro HSC expansion, HSCs, retrovirally transduced withNUP98-HOXA10hd, were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 15% FBS andcytokines (6 ng/mL of IL-3, 10 ng/mL of IL-6, 100 ng/mL of SCF, allPreprotech).

We chose the glycogen synthase kinase-3 β (GSK-3β) inhibitor TWS119(Gattinoni et al., Nat Med 15:808, 2009) as therapeutic cargo, based onreports that repeated high-dose bolus therapy of transplant recipientswith glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) inhibitors enhances therepopulation kinetics of donor HSCs (Trowbridge et al., Nat Med 12:89,2006). DNA-gel nanoparticles efficiently encapsulated thissmall-molecule drug, and slowly released it over a 7-day time window(data not shown). We evaluated the in vivo repopulation capabilities ofhematopoietic grafts supported by cell-bound TWS119-loaded nanoparticlesbased on the whole body photon emission from Fireflyluciferase-transgenic donor progenitor cells, and in separateexperiments, by tracing the frequencies of GFP⁺ donor progenitor cellsby flow cytometry. Following transplantation of murinelineage⁻Sca-1⁺c-kit⁺ progenitor cells from luciferase-transgenic donorsinto syngeneic recipients, a steady increase in whole bodybioluminescent emission was observed originating from discrete foci overanatomical sites corresponding to the femurs, humeri, sternum and thespleen (FIG. 14A). While a systemic TWS119 bolus injection (1.6 ng) atthe time of transplantation did not significantly alter measuredengraftment kinetics (FIGS. 14A and B), the same TWS119 doseencapsulated in nanoparticles surface-tethered to donor progenitor cellsmarkedly enhanced the proliferative reconstitution of progenitor cellgrafts (median 5.7-fold higher bioluminescence than systemic TWS119after 1 week, P<0.0001, FIGS. 14A-C). Notably, animals in all treatmentgroups initially engrafted progenitor cells in both femurs and thesternum, indicating that nanoparticle conjugation did not compromise theintrinsic homing properties of donor progenitor cells. While increasingthe rate of initial reconstitution, conjugating TWS119 nanoparticlesonto progenitor cells did not affect their multilineage differentiationpotential, reflected by a similar frequency of donor-derived GFP⁺reconstituted cell types compared to control progenitor cell graftsthree months after transplantation (FIG. 14D). Thus, this simpleapproach for donor cell modification just prior to cell transfer canalso augment hematopoietic progenitor cell, including hematopoietic stemcell, transplants, a procedure in routine clinical practice.

Example 6 Conjugation of Liposomes to Cells

One exemplary protocol for synthesizing unilamellar liposomes is asfollows: A DOPC/DOPG/MPB PE/DiD lipid film (lipid ratios as in polymernanoparticles) was hydrated with 185 μl PBS for a one-hour period withvigorous vortexing every 10 minutes. After six cycles of freezing(liquid N₂) and thawing, the liposomes were extruded 21 times through apolycarbonate filter (200 nm pore size, Whatman) and purified using aZeba Spin Desalting Column (Thermo Scientific).

FIG. 15 shows liposome conjugation to pmel-1 T cells. The confocal imageshows liposomes (blue) conjugated to the surfaces of pmel-1 T cells(CFSE-stained in green). Shown are 3D projections of optical sectionstaken by confocal microscopy.

REFERENCES

-   1. Rosenberg S A et al., Nat Rev Cancer 8(4): 299, 2008.-   2. Dudley M E et al., Science 298(5594): 850, 2002.-   3. June C H et al., J Clin Invest 117(5): 1204, 2007.-   4. Stephan M T et al., Nat Med 13(12): 1440, 2007.-   5. Yee C et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(25): 16168, 2002.-   6. Morgan R A et al., Science 314(5796): 126, 2006.-   7. Gade T P et al., Cancer Res 65(19): 9080, 2005.-   8. Anderson M J et al., J Immunol 178(3): 1268, 2007.-   9. Janicki C N et al., Cancer Res 68(8): 2993, 2008.-   10. Antony P A et al., J Immunol 176(9): 5255, 2006.-   11. Fontenot J D et al., Nat Immunol 6(11): 1142, 2005.-   12. Oh S et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(6): 3392, 2003.-   13. Waldmann T A, Nat Rev Immunol 6(8): 595, 2006.-   14. Waldmann T A et al., Immunity 14(2): 105, 2001.-   15. Dubois S et al., Immunity 17(5): 537, 2002.-   16. Stoklasek T A et al., J Immunol 177(9): 6072, 2006.-   17. Klebanoff C A et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(7): 1969, 2004.-   18. Teague R M et al., Nat Med 12(3): 335, 2006.-   19. Dubois S et al., J Immunol 180(4): 2099, 2008.-   20. Rubinstein M P et. al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(24): 9166,    2006.-   21. Epardaud Metal., Cancer Res 68(8): 2972, 2008.-   22. Beutler B, Nature 430(6996): 257, 2004.-   23. Iwasaki A et al., Nat Immunol 5(10): 987, 2004.-   24. Pulendran B, Immunol Rev 199: 227, 2004.-   25. Reis e Sousa C, Semin Immunol 16(1): 27, 2004.-   26. Pasare C et al., Science 299(5609): 1033, 2003.-   27. Yang Y et al., Nat Immunol 5(5): 508, 2004.-   28. Overwijk W W et al., J Exp Med 198(4): 569, 2003.-   29. Heckelsmiller K et al., Eur J Immunol 32(11): 3235, 2002.-   30. Furumoto K et al., J Clin Invest 113(5): 774, 2004.-   31. Currie A J et al., J Immunol 180(3): 1535, 2008.-   32. Vicari A P et al., J Exp Med 196(4): 541, 2002.-   33. Mata-Haro V et al., Science 316(5831): 1628, 2007.-   34. Paulos C M et al., Clin Cancer Res 13(18 Pt 1): 5280, 2007.-   35. Paulos C M et al., J Clin Invest 117(8): 2197, 2007.-   36. Hemmi H et al., Nat Immunol 3(2): 196, 2002.-   37. Stary G et al., J Exp Med 204(6): 1441, 2007.-   38. Goldstein D et al., J Infect Dis 178(3): 858, 1998.-   39. Soria I et al., Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 38(10): 476, 2000.-   40. Fan J et al., J Clin Invest 112(8): 1234, 2003.-   41. Gunzer M et al., Blood 106(7): 2424, 2005.-   42. Greenland J R et al., immunization. Mol Ther 12(1): 164, 2005.-   43. Hu Y et al., Nano Lett 7(10): 3056, 2007.-   44. Verma A et al., Nat Mater 7(7): 588, 2008.-   45. Zhao X et al., Biomaterials 26(24): 5048, 2005.-   46. Bershteyn A et al., Soft Matter 4: 1787, 2008.-   47. Davis M E et al., Nat Rev Drug Discov 7(9): 771, 2008.-   48. Green J J et al., Advanced Materials 19(19): 2836, 2007.-   49. Donsante A et al., Science 317(5837): 477, 2007.-   50. Kresge K J, IAVI Rep 9(4): 18, 2005.-   51. Mingozzi F et al., Nat Med 13(4): 419, 2007.-   52. Watkins D I et al., Nat Med 14(6): 617, 2008.-   53. Maeda H et al., J Control Release 65(1-2): 271, 2000.-   54. Matsumura Y et al., Cancer Res 46(12 Pt 1): 6387, 1986.-   55. Shi X Y et al., Advanced Materials 20(9): 1671, 2008.-   56. von Maltzahn G et al., Bioconjugate Chemistry 19(8): 1570, 2008.-   57. Drummond D C et al., Pharmacol Rev 51(4): 691, 1999.-   58. Kirpotin D B et al., Cancer Res 66(13): 6732, 2006.-   59. Park J W et al., Clin Cancer Res 8(4): 1172, 2002.-   60. Owens D E, Int J Pharm 307(1): 93, 2006.-   61. Vonarbourg A et al., Biomaterials 27(24): 4356, 2006.-   62. Moghimi S M et al., Pharmacol Rev 53(2): 283, 2001.-   63. Dou H et al., Blood 108(8): 2827, 2006.-   64. Cole C et al., Nat Med 11(10): 1073, 2005.-   65. Qiao J et al., Nat Med 14(1): 37, 2008.-   66. Monine M I et al., Biophys J 88(4): 2384, 2005.-   67. Lauffenburger D A et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(26): 15368,    1998.-   68. Joslin E J et al., J Cell Sci 120(Pt 20): 3688, 2007.-   69. Klebanoff C A et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(27): 9571,    2005.-   70. Overwijk W W et al., J Exp Med 188(2): 277, 1998.-   71. Sahaf B et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(7): 4001, 2003.-   72. Stachowiak A N et al., J Immunol 177(4): 2340, 2006.-   73. Chacon M et al., Int J Pharmaceutics 141(1-2): 81, 1996.-   74. Diwan M et al., Curr Drug Deliv 1(4): 405, 2004.-   75. Elamanchili P et al., Vaccine 22(19): 2406, 2004.-   76. Li Y et al., J Control Release 71(2): 203, 2001.-   77. Zhang Z P et al., Biomaterials 28(10): 1889, 2007.-   78. Heit A et al., Eur J Immunol 37(8): 2063, 2007.-   79. Hamann A et al., Eur J Immunol 30(11): 3207, 2000.

EQUIVALENTS

While several inventive embodiments have been described and illustratedherein, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily envision avariety of other means and/or structures for performing the functionand/or obtaining the results and/or one or more of the advantagesdescribed herein, and each of such variations and/or modifications isdeemed to be within the scope of the inventive embodiments describedherein. More generally, those skilled in the art will readily appreciatethat all parameters, dimensions, materials, and configurations describedherein are meant to be exemplary and that the actual parameters,dimensions, materials, and/or configurations will depend upon thespecific application or applications for which the inventive teachingsis/are used. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able toascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalentsto the specific inventive embodiments described herein. It is,therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presentedby way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claimsand equivalents thereto, inventive embodiments may be practicedotherwise than as specifically described and claimed. Inventiveembodiments of the present disclosure are directed to each individualfeature, system, article, material, kit, and/or method described herein.In addition, any combination of two or more such features, systems,articles, materials, kits, and/or methods, if such features, systems,articles, materials, kits, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent,is included within the inventive scope of the present disclosure.

All definitions, as defined and used herein, should be understood tocontrol over dictionary definitions, definitions in documentsincorporated by reference, and/or ordinary meanings of the definedterms.

The indefinite articles “a” and “an,” as used herein in thespecification and in the claims, unless clearly indicated to thecontrary, should be understood to mean “at least one.”

The phrase “and/or,” as used herein in the specification and in theclaims, should be understood to mean “either or both” of the elements soconjoined, i.e., elements that are conjunctively present in some casesand disjunctively present in other cases. Multiple elements listed with“and/or” should be construed in the same fashion, i.e., “one or more” ofthe elements so conjoined. Other elements may optionally be presentother than the elements specifically identified by the “and/or” clause,whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified.Thus, as a non-limiting example, a reference to “A and/or B”, when usedin conjunction with open-ended language such as “comprising” can refer,in one embodiment, to A only (optionally including elements other thanB); in another embodiment, to B only (optionally including elementsother than A); in yet another embodiment, to both A and B (optionallyincluding other elements); etc.

As used herein in the specification and in the claims, “or” should beunderstood to have the same meaning as “and/or” as defined above. Forexample, when separating items in a list, “or” or “and/or” shall beinterpreted as being inclusive, i.e., the inclusion of at least one, butalso including more than one, of a number or list of elements, and,optionally, additional unlisted items. Only terms clearly indicated tothe contrary, such as “only one of” or “exactly one of,” or, when usedin the claims, “consisting of,” will refer to the inclusion of exactlyone element of a number or list of elements. In general, the term “or”as used herein shall only be interpreted as indicating exclusivealternatives (i.e. “one or the other but not both”) when preceded byterms of exclusivity, such as “either,” “one of,” “only one of,” or“exactly one of.” “Consisting essentially of,” when used in the claims,shall have its ordinary meaning as used in the field of patent law.

As used herein in the specification and in the claims, the phrase “atleast one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should beunderstood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more ofthe elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including atleast one of each and every element specifically listed within the listof elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the listof elements. This definition also allows that elements may optionally bepresent other than the elements specifically identified within the listof elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether relatedor unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as anon-limiting example, “at least one of A and B” (or, equivalently, “atleast one of A or B,” or, equivalently “at least one of A and/or B”) canrefer, in one embodiment, to at least one, optionally including morethan one, A, with no B present (and optionally including elements otherthan B); in another embodiment, to at least one, optionally includingmore than one, B, with no A present (and optionally including elementsother than A); in yet another embodiment, to at least one, optionallyincluding more than one, A, and at least one, optionally including morethan one, B (and optionally including other elements); etc.

It should also be understood that, unless clearly indicated to thecontrary, in any methods claimed herein that include more than one stepor act, the order of the steps or acts of the method is not necessarilylimited to the order in which the steps or acts of the method arerecited.

In the claims, as well as in the specification above, all transitionalphrases such as “comprising,” “including,” “carrying,” “having,”“containing,” “involving,” “holding,” “composed of,” and the like are tobe understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limitedto. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consistingessentially of” shall be closed or semi-closed transitional phrases,respectively, as set forth in the United States Patent Office Manual ofPatent Examining Procedures, Section 2111.03.

1. A biodegradable nanoparticle comprising maleimide groups on itsexterior surface.
 2. The nanoparticle of claim 1, wherein thenanoparticle further comprises a lipid bilayer surface.
 3. Thenanoparticle of claim 1, wherein the nanoparticle comprises apoly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) core.
 4. The nanoparticle of claim 1,wherein the nanoparticle further comprises an agent.
 5. The nanoparticleof claim 1, wherein the nanoparticle further comprises a plurality ofagents.
 6. The nanoparticle of claim 4, wherein the agent is anantibody.
 7. The nanoparticle of claim 4, wherein the agent is anantigen.
 8. The nanoparticle of claim 4, wherein the agent is anadjuvant.
 9. The nanoparticle of claim 8, wherein the adjuvant is a TLRligand.
 10. The nanoparticle of claim 4, wherein the agent is a nucleicacid.
 11. The nanoparticle of claim 10, wherein the nucleic acid is ansiRNA.
 12. The nanoparticle of claim 4, wherein the agent is ananti-cancer agent.
 13. The nanoparticle of claim 4, wherein the agent isa cytokine.
 14. The nanoparticle of claim 4, wherein the agent is aninterleukin.
 15. The nanoparticle of claim 5, wherein the plurality ofagents comprises an antigen and an adjuvant.
 16. The nanoparticle ofclaim 5, wherein the plurality of agents comprises an adjuvant and ananti-cancer agent.
 17. The nanoparticle of claim 1, wherein thenanoparticle is 50-500 nanometers in diameter.
 18. The nanoparticle ofclaim 1, wherein the nanoparticle is about 150 nanometers in diameter.19. The nanoparticle of claim 1, in a lyophilized form.